Table 4.
Delta scores.
| Group | Difference between predicted and actual score ∗∗Mean (SD) |
Mean difference (95% CI) |
p value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Residency | |||
| GS (n = 26) | −9.1 (22.2) | 2.0 (−8.9–12.9) | 0.72 |
| OBG (n = 25) | −11.1 (15.9) | ||
| Gender | |||
| Male GS (n = 13) | 4.2 (17.6) | 26.7 (12.3–41.2) | <0.01 |
| Female GS (n = 13) | −22.5 (18.1) | ||
| Gender | |||
| Male GS (n = 13) | 4.2 (17.6) | 15.3 (3.9–26.7) | 0.01 |
| Female OBG (n = 25) | −11.1 (15.9) | ||
| Gender | |||
| Female GS (n = 13) | −22.5 (18.1) | 11.4 (−23.0–0.2) | 0.07 |
| Female OBG (n = 25) | −11.1 (15.9) | ||
| Ethnicity | |||
| Caucasian (n = 31) | −11.3 (19.4) | 3.2 (−7.8–14.3) | 0.56 |
| Non-Caucasian (n = 20) | −8.0 (20.7) | ||
| Training level | |||
| First half (n = 29) | −13.4 (17.3) | −7.7 (−18.1–3.1) | 0.16 |
| Second half (n = 22) | −5.7 (21.1) | ||
| FLS curriculum | |||
| Yes (n = 21) | −12.6 (21.1) | −4.3 (−15.0–6.4) | 0.43 |
| No (n = 30) | −8.3 (17.0) |
∗∗Negative score indicates resident underestimated real score versus what they predicted; positive score indicates overestimated real score.