Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 2;7:41752. doi: 10.1038/srep41752

Table 2. Association between Ki67 labeling index and clinicopathological findings.

Ki67 labeling index <5% (1) 5–10% (2) >10% (3) p-value (1 vs 2) p-value (2 vs 3) p-value (1 vs 3)
Number of cases 304 (77.0%) 68 (17.2%) 23 (5.8%)      
Age (mean ± s.d.) 51.2 ± 15.2 48.7 ± 17.4 52.5 ± 19.5 0.622a 0.793a 0.985a
Sex (F/M, % male) 255/47 (15.5%) 61/7 (10.3%) 18/5 (21.7%) nsb nsb nsb
Tumor size (mean ± s.d.) 20.8 ± 12.7 22.9 ± 13.1 29.5 ± 20.1 0.548a 0.380a 0.144a
LN metastasis 190/303 (62.7%) 43/68 (63.2%) 16/23 (69.6%) nsb nsb nsb
Distant metastasisd 3 (1.0%) 1 (1.5%) 2 (8.7%) nsb nsb nsb
Stagec       nsb nsb nsb
  I 128 35 9      
II 8 0 0
III 115 23 5
IV 53 10 9
Ex 212 (69.7%) 56 (82.4%) 17 (73.9%) nsb nsb nsb

ns: not significant, p ≥ 0.05.

aNon-parametric ANOVA with Dunnett post hoc test.

bMultiple comparison test for proportions (using the COMPROP procedure in SAS http://www2.sas.com/proceedings/sugi31/204-31.pdf).

cCalculations for Stage (I + II) vs. (III + IV).

dAll metastatic sites were the lung.