Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 2;9:10. doi: 10.1186/s13148-017-0316-8

Table 6.

Cox proportional hazards survival models including, age, sex, grade, mutation status, mdNLR and cg00901982 (linear and quadratic terms)

Baseline model Baseline + NLR Baseline + mdNLR + CpG Baseline + mdNLR + CpG + CpG2
n (%) Mean (sd) HR (95%CI) HR (95%CI) HR (95%CI) HR (95%CI)
Age 47 (44, 54) 0.99 (0.94, 1.05) 0.97 (0.92, 1.03) 0.97 (0.92, 1.03) 0.97 (0.92, 1.02)
Female 20 (27.8) Referent group Referent group Referent group Referent group
Male 52 (72.2) 0.75 (0.41, 1.38) 0.74 (0.4, 1.35) 0.74 (0.41, 1.36) 0.7 (0.38, 1.29)
mdNLR ≥4 28 (38.9) Referent group Referent group Referent group
mdNLR <4 44 (61.1) 0.49 (0.27, 0.9) 0.40 (0.17, 0.92) 0.69 (0.26, 1.81)
IDH only 30 (41.7) Referent group Referent group Referent group Referent group
TERT only 42 (58.3) 3.96 (1.98, 7.94) 4.56 (2.20, 9.43) 4.49 (2.16, 9.35) 4.73 (2.26, 9.88)
GBM 33 (45.8) Referent group Referent group Referent group Referent group
Non-GBM 39 (54.2) 0.92 (0.50, 1.71) 1.02 (0.54, 1.92) 1.00 (0.53, 1.90) 0.92 (0.48, 1.76)
cg00901982* 26.1 (21.4, 31.2) 1.20 (0.72, 1.99) 0.91 (0.03, 24.7)
cg009019822* 15.9 (1.12, 225)
Concordance 0.71(SE = 0.04) 0.73(SE = 0.04) 0.74(SE = 0.04) 0.74(SE = 0.04)
Brier score 0.1508 0.1506 0.1504 0.1473
Lrtest vs baseline model 0.02 0.06 0.02
Lrtest vs baseline + mdNLR model 0.49 0.13
Lrtest model linear (CpG) vs quadratic (CpG + CpG2) model 0.06

p values <0.05 are highlighted in bold font

All covariates modeled met proportionality assumptions

HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval, mdNLR methylation-derived neutrophil lymphocyte ratio, Lrtest likelihood ratio test

*Per every 10% increase in methylation