Tab. IV.
The final Logistic regression model of malaria vector control methods utilized by the 329 caregivers and their predictor on the study outcomes (adjusting for demographic factors).
Prevention methods | Severe malaria | Mortality |
---|---|---|
β (OR) p-value | β (OR) p-value | |
ITN (n = 43) | 0.20 (1.2) 0.560 | 18.50 (1.1) 1.00 |
IS (n = 242) | 0.51 (1.7) 0.30 | 1.51 (4.5) 0.18 |
NDW (n = 263) | 0.43 (1.5) 0.34 | 1.06 (2.9) 0.23 |
RES (n = 188) | -0.41 (0.7) 0.29 | 18.88 (1.6) 1.00 |
ITN+IS+NDW+RES (n = 9) | 1.66 (5.2) 0.04 | *-0.65 (0.5) 1.00 |
IS+NDW+RES (n = 141) | -0.19 (0.8) 0.69 | -18.58 (0.0) 1.00 |
IS+NDW (n = 212) | -1.24 (0.3) 0.05 | -0.81 (0.4) 0.58 |
p < 0.05
OR = odds ratio, β = measure of how strongly each predictor variable influences the outcome variables. ITN – Regular use of ITN, IS – Use of insecticide spray, NDW – Netting of doors/windows and RES – Regular environmental sanitation (clearing bushes and drainages around the house); Constant for the model was -0.28 (0.8) 0.41 for severe malaria and 1.15 (3.1) 0.01 for mortality.