Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Cogn Neurosci. 2016 Oct 25;29(3):520–529. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01067

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Average probabilities across touch conditions, before monocular deprivation (baseline) separately for the two eyes. The average probabilities of maintaining the same visual percept (orange bar), switching visual perception once (green bar), or switching more than once during a touch period (gray bar), conditioned to the type of visuo-haptic stimulation (congruent, incongruent orientation, or no touch)—(A) deprived eye and (B) nondeprived eye—error bars represent 1 ± SEM. The probability of maintaining the same visual percept for the whole touch period was significantly higher for the congruent visuo-haptic stimulation for both eyes compared with the no-touch stimulation, whereas the probability of switching visual percept was significantly higher for the incongruent (orthogonal) visuo-haptic stimulation for both eyes compared with the no-touch stimulation (paired-sample, two-tailed t test: n = 8, *p ≤ .05, **p ≤ .01, ***p ≤ .001, ‡p ≤ .05; however, the test did not survive the correction for multiple comparisons).