Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 2;12(2):e0171541. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171541

Table 2. Comparison of the sector and cluster values between the groups and the corresponding superotemporal and inferotemporal areas in the glaucoma group, respectively.

Healthy eyes (1) (n = 13) OHT eyes (2) (n = 22) Glaucoma eyes (3) (n = 27) P-value for comparison between groups P-value for ST vs. IT comparison, glaucoma group
IT sector PAFD (%; mean ± SD) 61.48 ± 4.48 59.30 ± 3.81 53.0 ± 6.87 1 vs. 2: 0.598*
1 vs.3: < 0.001*
2 vs.3: 0.001*
0.4790#
ST sector PAFD (%;mean ± SD) 58.2 ± 4.38 59.2 ± 6.35 51.58 ± 9.60 1 vs.2: 0.977*
1 vs.3: <0.039*
2 vs.3: 0.003*
IT sector RNFLT (μm; mean ± SD) 127.5 ± 20.7 128.8 ± 16.4 90.0 ± 26.9 1 vs. 2: 0.998*
1 vs.3:<0.001*
2 vs.3: < 0.001*
0.9519#
ST sector RNFLT (μm; mean ± SD) 132.6 ± 18.8 133.8 ± 15.6 89.6 ± 23.1 1 vs. 2: 0.998*
1 vs.3:<0.001*
2 vs.3: <0.001*
IT cluster MD (dB; median, quartiles) -0.5 -0.3 4.8 1 vs. 2: 0.529
1 vs.3: < 0.001
2 vs. 3: <0.001
0.8101#
-1.3 to 0.5 -0.8 to 0.7 1.6 to 18.9
ST cluster MD (dB; median, quartiles) -0.4 0.6 5.9 1 vs. 2: 0.999
1 vs.3: <0.001
2 vs.3: <0.001
-1.0 to 0.8 -0.5 to 1.3 1.8 to 18.4

OHT, ocular hypertension; IT, inferotemporal; ST, superotemporal; PAFD, peripapillary angioflow-density; RNFLT, retina nerve fiber layer thickness; MD mean defect

*Sidak test

‡ Kruskall-Wallis test with Bonferroni corrected paired comparison

# paired t-test