Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 23;11(1):e0005314. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005314

Fig 4. Probability of elimination in relation to the duration of mass treatment and the one-year post-treatment mf prevalence or Ov16 antibody seroprevalence.

Fig 4

A) The probability of elimination in relation to treatment duration, assuming that treatment would be discontinued after the indicated treatment duration. B) Probability of elimination in relation to the post-MDA mf prevalence in the population aged 5 years and above, measured one year after 1, 2, 3, … 25 treatment rounds, assuming that no further treatments take place. The lines connect outcomes for different durations of MDA, for the indicated coverage levels (60%, 70%, or 80%). C), similar to B, with probability of elimination shown in relation to the post-MDA Ov16 antibody prevalence in children aged 0–9, measured one year after the 1, 2, 3, … 25 treatment rounds. The Ov16 antibody prevalence was estimated according to hypothesis 2, assuming that the Ov16 antibody test has a sensitivity of 80%, and specificity of 99%. Note that the values on the X-axis in B and C is sorted from highest to lowest, for comparability with A. Results are shown for transmission settings with moderate and high transmission (ABR 10,150 and 18,078; average pre-control CMFL 10 and 55 mf/skin snip, respectively). See Fig 2 for the information on the mean mf and Ov16 antibody prevalence in relation to the duration of MDA.