Table 4.
Study Author (Date) | Research Aim | Population of Interest | Data Collection Methods | Context | Country | Region | Quality | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sub-Saharan Africa
| |||||||||
Alli (2013) | To explore to what extent interpersonal relations form a barrier to young people’s access to and satisfaction of health services among university students and providers. | Adolescents* (18–24) Providers** |
Qualitative: 204 IDIs1 |
University health services | South Africa | South Africa | Primary | ||
Berhane (2005) | To describe the health service utilization pattern of adolescents, assess their attitudes towards existing services, and their preference of services in terms of place, person and time. | Adolescents (10–24) |
Quantitative: Survey (n=2647) |
Secondary school | Ethiopia | East Africa | Secondary | ||
Biddlecom (2007) | To assess adolescents’ use of sexual and reproductive health services, the barriers they face in accessing such services and their opinions and preferences regarding different sources of care. | Adolescents (12–19) |
Quantitative: Survey n=5,955 (BF) n=4,430 (G) n=4,031 (M) n=5,112 (U) |
National surveys | Burkina Faso(BF) Ghana (G) Malawi (M) Uganda (U) |
South Africa | Primary | ||
Cherie (2012) | To assess adolescents' knowledge of STI symptoms and identify perceived barriers to seeking STIs services among high school adolescents. | Adolescents (15–24) |
Mixed Methods: Survey (n=316) 4 FGDs2 (n=38) |
Urban high schools and clubs | Ethiopia | East Africa | Primary | ||
Godia (2013) | To assess perspectives and experiences of health service providers on the SRH needs of young people. | Providers |
Qualitative: 19 IDIs 2 FGDs (n=38) |
Health Facilities | Kenya | East Africa | Primary | ||
Godia (2014) | To explore the SRH problems young people face as well as their perceptions of available SRH services. Compared experience with integrated and youth targeted SRH services. | Adolescents (10–24) |
Qualitative: 18 IDIs 39 FGDs (n=57) |
Health facilities & youth centers | Kenya | East Africa | Primary | ||
Kipp (2007) | To assess providers' perceptions and attitudes of important barriers for adolescents in receiving good quality RH services. Also to assess providers' attitudes related to adolescent sexual behavior and RH. | Providers |
Qualitative: 10 IDIs |
Health facilities | Uganda | East Africa | Primary | ||
Langhaug (2003) | To explore the views of young people, nurses, and parents on the accessibility of existing reproductive health services for young people and the means for improving this. | Adolescents (16–19) Providers |
Qualitative: 10 FGDs 16 Direct Observations |
Community FGDs | Zimbabwe | South Africa | Secondary | ||
Miles (2001) | To understand the social processes that inform young people's sexual health seeking behavior in rural areas with a focus on the influences of decision making in relation to seeking advice and treatment for STIs. | Adolescents (14–25) |
Qualitative:
12 FGDs (n=97) |
Village FGDs | Gambia | West Africa | Primary | ||
Molla (2009) | To assess youth's use, perceptions of, and preferences for STI services from the perspective of both youth and providers. | Adolescents (15–24) Providers |
Mixed Methods: Survey (n=3,743) 10 Provider IDIs |
Village survey & health clinic interviews | Ethiopia | East Africa | Primary | ||
Okereke (2010) | To examine the unmet reproductive health needs and health-seeking behavior of adolescents. | Adolescents (10–19) Providers |
Mixed Methods: Survey (n=896) 4 FGDs 15 IDIs with Providers |
Secondary school & community FGDs & survey | Nigeria | West Africa | Secondary | ||
Asia & the Pacific | |||||||||
Char (2011) | To investigate whether young unmarried rural men in India are underserved in terms of SRH issues. To review their knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions about SRH. | Adolescents (17–22) Unmarried Men |
Mixed Methods: Survey (n=316) 4 FGDs |
Village FGDs and survey | India | South Asia | Primary | ||
Kennedy (2013) | To assess barriers to accessing SRH services and describes the features of a youth friendly health service as defined by adolescents. | Adolescents (15–19) Providers |
Qualitative: 12 IDIs 66 FGDs (n=353) |
Community FGDs | Vanuatu | Pacific | Primary | ||
Nair (2013) | To explore the perceived reproductive health problems, health seeking behaviors, knowledge about available services and barriers to reach services among adolescents. | Adolescents (15–24) Providers Community |
Qualitative:
15 FGDs |
Community FGDs | India | South Asia | Secondary | ||
Prasad (2005) | To investigate the prevalence of RTIs in young married women and understand treatment seeking behavior. | Adolescents (16–22) Married women |
Mixed Methods: Cross-sectional survey (n=451), 17 IDIs, 8 FGDs |
Community FGDs & Survey | India | South Asia | Primary | ||
Regmi (2010) | To explore young people's perceptions of barriers to accessing sexual health services and information, including condom-use. | Adolescents (18–22) |
Qualitative:
10 FGDs 31 IDIs (n=50) |
Colleges and youth clubs | Nepal | South Asia | Primary | ||
Talpur (2012) | To assess attitudes towards services, awareness of and perceived barriers for sexual health services and education among young adults. | Adolescents (16–25) |
Quantitative: Cross sectional survey (n=150) |
Academic institutions | Pakistan | South Asia | Secondary | ||
Tangmunkongvorakul (2005) | To describe the experiences and perspectives of young people with regard to obstacles to their safe sexual health outcomes and desirable health services. | Adolescents (17–20) |
Qualitative: 82 IDIs |
Community interviews | Thailand | Southeast Asia | Primary | ||
Tangmunkongvorakul (2012) | To understand gender double standards and the ways in which these constitute barriers to successfully accessing sexual and reproductive health services. | Adolescents (14–20) |
Mixed Methods: Cross-sectional survey, 30 IDIs, 16 FGDs (n=1745) |
Community, non-formal educational centers, and schools | Thailand | Southeast Asia | Primary |
IDI: In-depth interview
FGD: Focus group discussion
Adolescents are defined as 10–24 for the purposes of this review
Providers category includes health service providers (doctors, nurses, health workers, etc.), NGO workers, and teachers. Some studies also include community and parental attitudes but these are not the focus of this analysis.