Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Adolesc Health. 2016 Jul;59(1):7–16. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.03.014

Table 4.

Overview of studies included in synthesis (n=19)

Study Author (Date) Research Aim Population of Interest Data Collection Methods Context Country Region Quality
Sub-Saharan Africa
Alli (2013) To explore to what extent interpersonal relations form a barrier to young people’s access to and satisfaction of health services among university students and providers. Adolescents*
(18–24)

Providers**
Qualitative:
204 IDIs1
University health services South Africa South Africa Primary
Berhane (2005) To describe the health service utilization pattern of adolescents, assess their attitudes towards existing services, and their preference of services in terms of place, person and time. Adolescents
(10–24)
Quantitative:
Survey
(n=2647)
Secondary school Ethiopia East Africa Secondary
Biddlecom (2007) To assess adolescents’ use of sexual and reproductive health services, the barriers they face in accessing such services and their opinions and preferences regarding different sources of care. Adolescents
(12–19)
Quantitative: Survey
n=5,955 (BF)
n=4,430 (G)
n=4,031 (M)
n=5,112 (U)
National surveys Burkina Faso(BF)
Ghana (G)
Malawi (M)
Uganda (U)
South Africa Primary
Cherie (2012) To assess adolescents' knowledge of STI symptoms and identify perceived barriers to seeking STIs services among high school adolescents. Adolescents
(15–24)
Mixed Methods: Survey (n=316)
4 FGDs2 (n=38)
Urban high schools and clubs Ethiopia East Africa Primary
Godia (2013) To assess perspectives and experiences of health service providers on the SRH needs of young people. Providers Qualitative:
19 IDIs
2 FGDs
(n=38)
Health Facilities Kenya East Africa Primary
Godia (2014) To explore the SRH problems young people face as well as their perceptions of available SRH services. Compared experience with integrated and youth targeted SRH services. Adolescents
(10–24)
Qualitative:
18 IDIs
39 FGDs
(n=57)
Health facilities & youth centers Kenya East Africa Primary
Kipp (2007) To assess providers' perceptions and attitudes of important barriers for adolescents in receiving good quality RH services. Also to assess providers' attitudes related to adolescent sexual behavior and RH. Providers Qualitative:
10 IDIs
Health facilities Uganda East Africa Primary
Langhaug (2003) To explore the views of young people, nurses, and parents on the accessibility of existing reproductive health services for young people and the means for improving this. Adolescents
(16–19)
Providers
Qualitative:
10 FGDs
16 Direct Observations
Community FGDs Zimbabwe South Africa Secondary
Miles (2001) To understand the social processes that inform young people's sexual health seeking behavior in rural areas with a focus on the influences of decision making in relation to seeking advice and treatment for STIs. Adolescents
(14–25)
Qualitative:
12 FGDs
(n=97)
Village FGDs Gambia West Africa Primary
Molla (2009) To assess youth's use, perceptions of, and preferences for STI services from the perspective of both youth and providers. Adolescents
(15–24)

Providers
Mixed Methods: Survey (n=3,743)
10 Provider IDIs
Village survey & health clinic interviews Ethiopia East Africa Primary
Okereke (2010) To examine the unmet reproductive health needs and health-seeking behavior of adolescents. Adolescents
(10–19)

Providers
Mixed Methods:
Survey (n=896)
4 FGDs
15 IDIs with Providers
Secondary school & community FGDs & survey Nigeria West Africa Secondary

Asia & the Pacific
Char (2011) To investigate whether young unmarried rural men in India are underserved in terms of SRH issues. To review their knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions about SRH. Adolescents
(17–22)
Unmarried Men
Mixed Methods:
Survey (n=316)
4 FGDs
Village FGDs and survey India South Asia Primary
Kennedy (2013) To assess barriers to accessing SRH services and describes the features of a youth friendly health service as defined by adolescents. Adolescents
(15–19)

Providers
Qualitative:
12 IDIs
66 FGDs
(n=353)
Community FGDs Vanuatu Pacific Primary
Nair (2013) To explore the perceived reproductive health problems, health seeking behaviors, knowledge about available services and barriers to reach services among adolescents. Adolescents
(15–24)

Providers
Community
Qualitative:
15 FGDs
Community FGDs India South Asia Secondary
Prasad (2005) To investigate the prevalence of RTIs in young married women and understand treatment seeking behavior. Adolescents
(16–22)
Married women
Mixed Methods: Cross-sectional survey (n=451),
17 IDIs, 8 FGDs
Community FGDs & Survey India South Asia Primary
Regmi (2010) To explore young people's perceptions of barriers to accessing sexual health services and information, including condom-use. Adolescents
(18–22)
Qualitative:
10 FGDs
31 IDIs
(n=50)
Colleges and youth clubs Nepal South Asia Primary
Talpur (2012) To assess attitudes towards services, awareness of and perceived barriers for sexual health services and education among young adults. Adolescents
(16–25)
Quantitative:
Cross sectional survey (n=150)
Academic institutions Pakistan South Asia Secondary
Tangmunkongvorakul (2005) To describe the experiences and perspectives of young people with regard to obstacles to their safe sexual health outcomes and desirable health services. Adolescents
(17–20)
Qualitative:
82 IDIs
Community interviews Thailand Southeast Asia Primary
Tangmunkongvorakul (2012) To understand gender double standards and the ways in which these constitute barriers to successfully accessing sexual and reproductive health services. Adolescents
(14–20)
Mixed Methods: Cross-sectional survey,
30 IDIs, 16 FGDs
(n=1745)
Community, non-formal educational centers, and schools Thailand Southeast Asia Primary
1

IDI: In-depth interview

2

FGD: Focus group discussion

*

Adolescents are defined as 10–24 for the purposes of this review

**

Providers category includes health service providers (doctors, nurses, health workers, etc.), NGO workers, and teachers. Some studies also include community and parental attitudes but these are not the focus of this analysis.