Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Oct 15;216(2):177.e1–177.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.10.007

Table 3.

Time trends in the crude and age-adjusted prevalence of pregestational type 1 diabetes (95% Confidence Interval) per 100 deliveries by race/ethnicity: Kaiser Permanente Northern California 1996–2014.

1996–1999
(n= 124,825)
2000–2002
(n= 102,060)
2003–2005
(n= 103,701)
2006–2008
(n= 109,200)
2009–2011
(n= 104,901)
2012–2014
(n=110,775)
% Changea P for
trend
All
Crude 0.13 0.13 0.18 0.20 0.28 0.23 76.9
Age-adjusted 0.14 0.13 0.19 0.20 0.29 0.24 73.2 <.0001
Non-Hispanic White
Crude 0.17 0.18 0.25 0.29 0.39 0.38 124
Age-adjusted 0.17 0.17 0.24 0.28 0.37 0.36 118.4 <.0001
African American
Crude 0.20 0.23 0.34 0.21 0.33 0.24 20.0
Age-adjusted 0.23 0.26 0.38 0.24 0.37 0.27 17.0 0.43
Asian
Crude 0.10 0.03 0.10 0.09 0.12 0.08 −20.0
Age-adjusted 0.11 0.04 0.11 0.10 0.13 0.09 −18.4 0.57
Hispanic
Crude 0.08 0.09 0.16 0.16 0.26 0.16 100
Age-adjusted 0.08 0.09 0.17 0.16 0.26 0.16 88.3 <.0001
a

Indicates rate change from 1996–1999 to 2012–2014 prevalence estimates