Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 28;36(2):317–326. doi: 10.1007/s10067-016-3405-8

Table 4.

GLMM outcomes with DAS over/underestimation as dependent variable and DAS and conditions as independent variables

BeSt IMPROVED
Dependent: DAS overestimation OR 95 % CI p value OR 95 % CI p value
DAS <1.6 ref ref
DAS ≥1.6–≤ 2.4 9.86 5.88–16.53 <0.001 22.03 16.65–29.15 <0.001
DAS >2.4 97.29 58.45–161.93 <0.001
DAS 2.97 2.72–3.24 <0.001 3.68 3.25–4.16 <0.001
Conditions
1 0.87 0.73–1.03 0.096 5.65 4.67–6.84 <0.001
2 1.16 0.88–1.52 0.300 1.88 1.39–2.55 <0.001
3 0.76 0.64–0.91 0.002 3.03 2.51–3.66 <0.001
4 2.96 2.51–3.49 <0.001 4.49 3.68–5.48 <0.001
Dependent: DAS underestimation
DAS <1.6 0.53 0.40–0.70 <0.001 0.48 0.38–0.60 <0.001
DAS ≥1.6–≤ 2.4 1.40 1.11–1.77 0.005 ref
DAS >2.4 ref
DAS 1.39 1.25–1.55 <0.001 1.95 1.70–2.25 <0.001
Condition
5 6.73 5.00–9.06 <0.001 8.21 5.80–11.61 <0.001
Dependent: satisfied with treatment effect
DAS <1.6 76.48 53.67–108.98 <0.001 26.06 20.68–32.84 <0.001
DAS ≥1.6–≤ 2.4 10.07 7.95–12.76 <0.001 ref
DAS >2.4 ref
DAS 0.09 0.08–0.11 <0.001 0.07 0.06–0.08 <0.001

DAS disease activity score, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval