Table 2.
Data for Cervix Location Under Different Traction Forces Presented in Figure 1 for Three Groups of Women with Varying Degrees of Pelvic Support
| Normal Normal (N=14) |
Normal Prolapse (N=11) |
Prolapse Prolapse (N=27) |
P values
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | NN vs PP | NN vs NP | NP vs PP | ||||
| Clinic POP-Q Point C | −6.0 (−7.0,−5.5) | −6.0 (−8.0,−5.0) | −2.5 (−4.0,−2.0) | < .001 | <. 001 | .928 | < .001 |
| Operating Room | |||||||
| 1 N | −2.9 (−4.2,−2.2) | −1.4 (−3.0,1.0) | 0.3 (−1.6, 1.5) | < .001 | < .001 | .03 a | .07 |
| 18 N | −0.2 (−1.3, 0.7) | 1.7 (1, 4.2) | 3.9 (2.4,6.1) | < .001 | < .001 | .01 | .03b |
Data presented as median (IQR). POP-Q Point C reported in reference to the hymenal ring (0 cm) and measured during maximal Valsalva. P values comparing groups were determined by simple linear regression models.
a
p = .11 after adjusting for age and parity
b
p = .07 after adjusting for age and parity