Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pediatr Obes. 2016 Jun 10;12(5):398–405. doi: 10.1111/ijpo.12157

Table 2.

Mean WHZ score under hypothetical lifestyle interventions

Interventions Mean WHZ at the end of follow-upa (n = 799) Mean WHZ at the end of follow- upb (n = 553) Average percent intervened on (%)c
(0) No intervention, natural course 0.73 (0.65 to 0.81) 0.71 (0.62 to 0.80) 0
(1) Breastfeed exclusively for at least 6 months 0.62 (0.49 to 0.77) 0.63 (0.48 to 0.78) 77
(2) Watch TV for no more than one hour a day 0.72 (0.61 to 0.84) 0.74 (0.60 to 0.87) 65
(3) Eat at least five fruits and vegetables/day 0.75 (0.66 to 0.84) 0.71 (0.60 to 0.82) 38
(4) Eliminate SSB consumption 0.74 (0.65 to 0.83) 0.73 (0.63 to 0.84) 35
(5) Play at the playground everyday 0.74 (0.57 to 0.92) 0.67 (0.47 to 0.87) 90
(6) Eliminate fast-food consumption 0.69 (0.52 to 0.86) 0.63 (0.40 to 0.87) 85
(7) Low-risk lifestyle intervention ( 1– 3 combined) 0.64 (0.48 to 0.79) 0.65 (0.47 to 0.84) 94
(8) Low-risk lifestyle intervention ( 1 + 4 + 6 combined) 0.60 (0.39 to 0.81) 0.56 (0.32 to 0.81) 97
(9) All interventions (1 – 6 combined) 0.63 (0.38 to 0.87) 0.55 (0.25 to 0.85) 100
a

Model 1 adjusted for baseline WHZ1, baseline age, gender, race/ethnicity, birthweight, maternal language preference, maternal educational level, maternal age, family size, family monthly income, follow-up time.

b

Model 2 adjusted for model 1 covariates and maternal BMI

Note that the model for WHZ3 further included interaction terms between race and WHZ2 and between WHZ1 and WHZ2. No interaction was included in the WHZ2 model

c

Using the first analytic sample (n=799)