Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 13;6(12):e981. doi: 10.1038/tp.2016.148

Table 1. Demographic and clinical characteristics of study subjects.

  Unaffected comparison (UC) n=29 Clinical high risk, not psychotic (CHR-NP) n=37 Clinical high risk, psychotic (CHR-P) n=30
Age, average (s.d.) 19.3 (4.4) 18.1 (3.8) 18.7 (3.7)
 
Ancestry
 % Caucasian 61%, 65% 52%
 % African 32% 13.5% 19%
 % Asian 7% 13.5% 19%
 % Mixed 0% 8% 10%
       
Sex, % male 68% 62% 74%
SES, average (s.d.) 7.5 (1.7) 6.5 (1.7) 6.2 (1.6)
 
Peripheral blood mononuclear cells
 Neutrophils % 56 (11) 55 (13) 55 (10)
 Lymphocytes % 34 (9) 35 (11) 33 (9)
 Monocytes % 8 (2) 7 (3) 8 (3)
 Eosinophils % 2 (3) 2 (2) 2 (2)
 Basophils % 1 (1) 1 (1) 1 (1)
 
SOPS scores, average (s.d.)
 Totala 4.8 (5.3) 36.8 (12.4) 45.0 (13.0)
 Positivea 1.3 (1.8) 12.6 (4.4) 13.9 (3.7)
 Negativea 1.3 (1.8) 11.5 (5.9) 14.0 (5.9)
 Disorganizeda .8 (1.1) 4.9 (2.6) 6.2 (3.4)
       
Generala,b 1.4 (1.7) 7.8 (4.5) 10.9 (4.7)
 
Prescription medication
 Antipsychoticc 0% 27% 13%
 Antidepressantd 3% 24% 23%
 Stimulant 0% 7% 6%
 Mood stabilizer 0% 0% 3%
 Benzodiazepinee 0% 3% 13%
 NSAID 0% 0% 0%
 Antibiotic 0% 0% 0%
 
Substance use
 Tobacco usef 7% 30% 39%
 Alcohol use 41% 38% 35%
 Marijuana useg 7% 24% 32%

Abbreviations: NSAID, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug; SES, socioeconomic status.

a

CHR-P vs UC t-test P-value<0.0001, CHR-NP vs UC t-test P-value<0.0001.

b

CHR-P vs CHR-NP t-test P-value=0.02.

c

CHR-P vs UC FET P-value=0.047, CHR-NP vs UC FET P-value=0.001.

d

CHR-P vs UC FET P-value=0.011, CHR-NP vs UC FET P-value=0.002.

e

CHR-P vs UC FET P-value=0.047.

f

CHR-P vs UC FET P-value=0.001, CHR-NP vs UC FET P-value=0.02.

g

CHR-P vs UC FET P-value=0.020, CHR-NP vs UC FET P-value=0.056.