Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 10;73(Pt 2):127–132. doi: 10.1107/S205698901700010X

Table 1. Comparison of selected bond lengths, bond angles and torsion angles (Å, °).

  (bipy)(mebzimpy)chlorido­iridium(III)(PF6)2 (Yutaka et al., 2005) (geometry: slightly distorted octa­hedral) Title complex (geometry: slightly distorted octa­hedral)
Bond Length    
Ir—Cl 2.338 (3) 2.3510 (9)
Ir—N1 2.039 (8) 2.032 (3)
Ir—N3 1.991 (8) 1.992 (3)
Ir—N5 2.032 (9) 2.037 (3)
Ir—N6 2.046 (9) 2.050 (3)
Ir—N7 2.049 (9) 2.057 (3)
     
Bond Angles    
N3—Ir—N5 78.9 (3) 80.34 (13)
N3—Ir—N7 178.5 (4) 178.09 (13)
N6—Ir—N7 81.0 (4) 79.55 (12)
N1—Ir—N5 156.3 (3) 158.99 (13)
N3—Ir—N6 103.4 (2) 99.62 (12)
     
Torsion Angles    
N1—C7—C8—N3 0 (1) −6.6 (5)
N3—C12—C13—N5 −1 (1) −1.1 (5)
N6—C32—C33—N7 4 (1) 7.3 (5)

Atom labels correspond to atoms of the title complex, analogous relationships reported by Yutaka et al. (2005) were compared.