Table 2. Results of single and multiple logistic regression analyses of DEGs in OSKM + miR-29b-iPSC based on logFPKM_iPSC, K36, K4, and K27 signals.

	Crude OR (95%CI)	Adj. OR (95%CI)	P (Wald’s test)	P (LR-test)
DEGs up-regulated by miR-29b
logFPKM_iPSC (cont. var.)	0.19 (0.17, 0.21)	0.16 (0.13, 0.18)	<0.001	<0.001
GSE12241_ES_H3K36me3: 1 vs 0	0.48 (0.37, 0.62)	1.34 (1.02, 1.76)	0.036	0.042
GSE12241_ES_H3K4me3: 1 vs 0	0.81 (0.72, 0.91)	1.53 (1.34, 1.75)	<0.001	<0.001
GSE12241_ES_H3K27me3: 1 vs 0	3.14 (2.59, 3.81)	1.60 (1.31, 1.97)	<0.001	<0.001
DEGs down-regulated by miR-29b
logFPKM_iPSC (cont. var.)	0.77 (0.65, 0.92)	0.98 (0.82, 1.16)	0.783	0.783
GSE12241_ES_H3K36me3: 1 vs 0	0.16 (0.07, 0.39)	0.22 (0.09, 0.54)	<0.001	<0.001
GSE12241_ES_H3K4me3: 1 vs 0	0.56 (0.44, 0.72)	0.61 (0.47, 0.79)	<0.001	<0.001
GSE12241_ES_H3K27me3: 1 vs 0	2.67 (1.82, 3.93)	2.74 (1.84, 4.10)	<0.001	<0.001