Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 3;7:41624. doi: 10.1038/srep41624

Figure 4. The OSR and TFSR comparison between BCLC-A group and BCLC-B group.

Figure 4

(A) The OSR comparison between BCLC-A group and BCLC-B group in RFA group: The BCLC-A group and BCLC-B group showed comparable OSR in the solitary RFA subgroup and TACE combined RFA subgroup (P = 0.953 for BCLC-A group, P = 0.987 for BCLC-B group); (B) The OSR comparison between BCLC-A group and BCLC-B group in Resection group: The BCLC-A group and BCLC-B group showed comparable OSR in the solitary resection subgroup and TACE combined resection subgroup (P = 0.853 for BCLC-A group, P = 0.955 for BCLC-B group); (C) The OSR comparison between BCLC-A group and BCLC-B group in LT group: The BCLC-A group and BCLC-B group showed comparable OSR in the solitary LT subgroup and TACE combined LT subgroup (P = 0.978 for BCLC-A group, P = 0.937 for BCLC-B group); (D) The TFSR comparison between BCLC-A group and BCLC-B group in RFA group: The BCLC-A group and BCLC-B group showed comparable TFSR in the solitary RFA subgroup and TACE combined RFA subgroup (P = 0.388 for BCLC-A group, P = 0.912 for BCLC-B group); (E) The TFSR comparison between BCLC-A group and BCLC-B group in Resection group: The BCLC-A group and BCLC-B group showed comparable TFSR in the solitary resection subgroup and TACE combined resection subgroup (P = 0.536 for BCLC-A group, P = 0.933 for BCLC-B group); (F) The TFSR comparison between BCLC-A group and BCLC-B group in LT group: The BCLC-A group and BCLC-B group showed comparable TFSR in the solitary LT subgroup and TACE combined LT subgroup (P = 0.937 for BCLC-A group, P = 0.582 for BCLC-B group).