Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 3;12(2):e0171264. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171264

Fig 10. Comparison of chloroplast genome of five Ulmus species.

Fig 10

Fig 10A and Fig 10B were take U pumila L as contrast, In Fig 10A blast 1 to blast 3 were U. davidiana Planch.var. japonica (Rehd.) Nakai, U. macrocarpa Hance., and U. davidiana Planch. Fig 10B blast 1 was U. laciniata Mayr. Ring 1: Forward strand features from Ulmus pumila L. Rings 2,3,4: Forward strand start and stop codons in reading frames 3,2,1. Rings 5,6,7: Reverse strand start and stop codons in reading frames 1,2,3. Ring 8: Forward strand features from U. pumila L. Rings 9,10,11: Blast result of chloroplast genome 1,2,3. Ring 12: GC content of U. pumila L.