TABLE 2.
Donor | % Total TLR9+ (R1 gate) | % Isotype control (R1 gate) | % TLR9+ MHC II+ CD19+ (R2 gate) | % TLR9+ MHC II+ CD19− (R2 gate) | % TLR9+ MHC II+ CD11c+ (R2 gate) | % TLR9+ MHC IIlow CD123bright (R2 gate) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 5.9 | 1.0 | 12.5 | 66.4 | NDb | 31.9 |
2 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 13.0 | 82.9 | ND | 6.1 |
3 | 7.1 | 0.6 | 11.2 | 85.5 | ND | 3.5 |
4 | 8.4 | 0.7 | 14.1 | 72.0 | ND | 2.4 |
5 | 13.3 | 0.8 | 2.5 | 93.4 | 89.3 | 2.6 |
6 | 4.4 | 1.0 | 26.2 | 64.2 | 63.3 | 9.3 |
7 | 13.1 | 0.9 | 10.8 | 80.7 | 82.4 | 2.7 |
8 | 14.8 | 1.4 | 2.4 | 92.1 | 93.4 | 2.5 |
9 | 19.7 | 1.2 | 3.5 | 83.7 | 83.4 | 2.9 |
10 | 13.6 | 1.3 | 4.9 | 84.6 | 87.6 | 2.5 |
Avg ± SD | 10.1 ± 5.7 | 0.9 ± 0.4 | 10.1 ± 7.3 | 80.6 ± 10.0 | 83.2 ± 10.6 | 6.6 ± 9.1 |
Phenotypic analysis is based on flow cytometric analysis data (Fig. 2) obtained from 10 independent donors.
ND, not done.