Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 6;9(1):e961. doi: 10.7759/cureus.961

Table 3. Subgroup multivariate regression analysis for PCSM for each race, using the proportional hazards model described by Fine and Gray, accounting for OCM as a competing risk for PCSM.

  AsA AA NHW
AHR [95% CI] p AHR [95% CI] p AHR [95% CI] p
Gleason Score:            
8 1.000   1.000   1.000  
9 2.005 [1.176-3.420] 0.011 2.821 [2.138-3.723] <0.001 2.024 [1.779-2.302] <0.001
10 2.287 [0.637-8.220] 0.200 5.051 [3.017-8.455] <0.001 4.448 [3.479-5.687] <0.001
Treatment:            
EBRT+BT 1.000   1.000   1.000  
RP 0.894 [0.372-2.150] 0.800 0.596 [0.382-0.931] 0.023 0.810 [0.648-1.013] 0.065
EBRT 1.307 [0.563-3.030] 0.530 0.997 [0.670-1.486] 0.990 1.338 [1.087-1.646] 0.006
T stage:            
T1 1.000   1.000   1.000  
T2 1.631 [0.917-2.900] 0.096 1.193 [0.892-1.596] 0.240 1.225 [1.070-1.403] 0.003
T3 1.400 [0.505-3.880] 0.520 2.426 [1.637-3.594] <0.001 1.956 [1.610-2.377] <0.001
T4 6.214 [1.731-22.31] 0.005 2.688 [1.237-5.842] 0.013 3.149 [1.961-5.056] <0.001
Age at diagnosis: 1.002 [0.968-1.040] 0.930 1.000 [0.982-1.018] 1.000 1.007 [0.998-1.015] 0.120
Year of diagnosis: 0.892 [0.758-1.050] 0.170 0.952 [0.888-1.020] 0.160 0.906 [0.878-0.934] <0.001