Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Feb 4.
Published in final edited form as: Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014 Jun 26;37(5):382–388. doi: 10.1159/000362590

Table 3.

Microbleeds and progression of WML volume.

Difference in annual progression of WML volume
Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
No pre-existing microbleeds Reference Reference Reference
Pre-existing microbleeds (all) −0.03 (−0.15; 0.09) −0.05 (−0.17; 0.08) −0.01 (−0.14; 0.11)
 Pre-existing strictly lobar −0.04 (−0.18; 0.10) −0.06 (−0.20; 0.08) −0.07 (−0.21; 0.08)
 Pre-existing deep or infratentorial 0.01 (−0.19; 0.18) −0.01 (−0.21; 0.18) 0.09 (−0.11; 0.28)

No incident microbleeds Reference Reference Reference
Incident microbleeds (all) 0.23 (0.05; 0.40) 0.19 (0.01; 0.37) 0.22 (0.04; 0.41)
 Incident strictly lobar 0.41 (0.21; 0.62) 0.39 (0.18; 0.61) 0.33 (0.10; 0.55)
 Incident deep or infratentorial −0.10 (−0.37; 0.17) −0.17 (−0.45; 0.11) 0.02 (−0.28; 0.32)

Model 1: adjusted for age, sex, scan interval, and intracranial volume.

Model 2: as model 1, additionally adjusted for blood pressures, total and HDL cholesterol, smoking, diabetes mellitus, lipid lowering medication, antihypertensive medication, and antiplatelet medication.

Model 3: as model 1, additionally adjusted for apolipoprotein E ε4 genotype.

Values represent differences in annual white matter lesion volume progression in participants with pre-existing and incident microbleeds compared to no microbleeds.

Abbreviations: WML= white matter lesion.