Table 3.
Chi-square tests among groups between social/organizational measures
| Variable | Turnover intention (n = 721) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strong (n = 138, 19%) |
Weak (n = 447, 62%) |
Very weak (n = 136,19%) |
Total | ||||
| n | (%) | n | (%) | n | (%) | ||
| Prestige of working environment n (%), P = 0.7879 | |||||||
| Very low | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| Low | 2 | (16.67) | 7 | (58.33) | 3 | (25.00) | 12 |
| High | 98 | (19.80) | 303 | (61.21) | 94 | (18.99) | 495 |
| Very high | 38 | (17.76) | 137 | (64.02) | 39 | (18.22) | 214 |
| Organizational commitment n (%), P = 0.2991 | |||||||
| Very low | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| Low | 12 | (30.00) | 20 | (50.00) | 8 | (20.00) | 40 |
| High | 109 | (19.12) | 357 | (62.63) | 104 | (18.25) | 570 |
| Very high | 17 | (15.32) | 70 | (63.06) | 24 | (21.62) | 111 |
| Career commitment n (%), P = 0.7415a | |||||||
| Very low | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| Low | 3 | (8.33) | 28 | (77.78) | 5 | (13.89) | 36 |
| High | 107 | (19.42) | 340 | (61.71) | 104 | (18.87) | 551 |
| Very high | 22 | (19.13) | 69 | (60.00) | 24 | (20.87) | 115 |
| Social support n (%), P = 0.8423 | |||||||
| Very low | 9 | (28.13) | 18 | (56.25) | 5 | (15.63) | 32 |
| Low | 60 | (17.70) | 214 | (63.13) | 65 | (19.17) | 339 |
| High | 63 | (19.50) | 199 | (61.61) | 61 | (18.89) | 323 |
| Very high | 6 | (22.22) | 15 | (55.56) | 6 | (22.22) | 27 |
| Work stress n (%), P < 0.0001 | |||||||
| No stress (0 ~ 59) | 31 | (11.44) | 157 | (57.93) | 83 | (30.63) | 271 |
| Low (60–70) | 28 | (24.78) | 67 | (59.29) | 18 | (15.93) | 113 |
| Medium (71–81) | 20 | (16.81) | 83 | (69.75) | 16 | (13.45) | 119 |
| High (82–92) | 14 | (17.07) | 58 | (70.73) | 10 | (12.20) | 82 |
| Very high (93–200) | 45 | (33.09) | 82 | (60.29) | 9 | (6.62) | 136 |
aLikelihood ratio of the chi-square value