Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Feb 5.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Aug 7;213(5):662.e1–662.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.001

Table 3.

Univariable analysis of risk factors for discontinuation of baseline contraceptive method at 3 years

Univariable model

HR 95% CI
Contraceptive method
OCP Reference
LNG-IUD 0.30 0.27 0.35
Cu-IUD 0.31 0.26 0.38
Implant 0.48 0.40 0.56
DMPA 1.01 0.85 1.20
Patch 1.21 0.94 1.56
Ring 1.12 0.96 1.30

Age
14–19 1.55 1.38 1.74
20+ Reference

Race
Black 1.20 1.09 1.32
White Reference
Others 1.30 1.10 1.54

Education
 ≤High School Reference
Some college 0.93 0.84 1.03
College grad 0.82 0.73 0.93

Body Mass Index
Underweight 1.18 0.92 1.51
Normal Reference
Overweight 0.91 0.82 1.02
Obese 0.78 0.70 0.87

Low Socioeconomic Status
No Reference
Yes 0.95 0.87 1.04

Insurance
None 1.07 0.97 1.18
Commercial Ref
Public 1.04 0.90 1.20

Parity
0 1.38 1.27 1.51
1+ Reference

Prior Unintended Pregnancies
0 Reference
1+ 0.79 0.72 0.87

History of STI
No Reference
Yes 1.13 1.03 1.24
a

HR, hazard ratio

b

CI, confidence interval

c

OCP, oral contraceptive pill

d

LNG, levonorgestrel

e

IUD, intrauterine device

f

Cu, copper

g

DMPA, depot medroxyprogesterone acetate

h

Low socioeconomic status is defined as trouble paying for basic needs (food, housing, medical care, transportation) or receiving government aid (food stamps, welfare)

i

STI, sexually transmitted infection