Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Feb 5.
Published in final edited form as: Chronobiol Int. 2016 Aug 5;33(9):1267–1279. doi: 10.1080/07420528.2016.1207660

Table 3.

Subject characteristics by treatment group.

Treatment Group
Variable goLite 465 goLite 595 p-value
Number of subjects 18 17
Age, years 49.9 ± 11.2 38.9 ± 11.4 0.008
Gender, N (%) 0.4
 Male 6 (33.3) 3 (17.6)
 Female 12 (66.7) 14 (82.4)
Race, N (%) 0.6
 Caucasian 17 (94.4) 15 (88.2)
 Other 1 (5.6) 2 (11.8)
Education level 0.3
 Technical or Some College 4 (22.2) 3 (17.6)
 2-Year Degree 4 (22.2) 1 (5.8)
 4-Year Degree 7 (38.9) 6 (35.3)
 Master’s or Doctoral 3 (16.7) 7 (41.2)
Marital status 1.0
 Single 6 (33.3) 6 (35.3)
 Married or Partnered 8 (44.4) 7 (41.2)
 Divorced or Widowed 4 (22.2) 4 (23.5)
Study site, N (%) 1.0
 BWH 1 (5.6) 2 (11.8)
 McLean 1 (5.6) 0 (0.0)
 Minnesota 2 (11.1) 2 (11.8)
 Mayo 11 (61.1) 11 (64.7)
 Comm Res 3 (16.7) 2 (11.8)
Baseline SIGH-ADS 29.4 ± 5.3 25.8 ± 5.1 0.05
Baseline Q-LES-Q-SF 42.5 ± 7.1 43.6 ± 6.4 0.5

Q-LES-Q-SF: Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire – short form; SIGH-ADS: Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, Atypical Depression Symptoms.