Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan;5(1):E41–E46. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-121668

Table 3. Complete informed consent comprehension percentages by study and age group. .

Informed consent element Intervention group Control group P value
Nature of procedure (Subscore = 4) Parent (P): 97 %--------------Youth (Y): 86 % Child (C): 79 %Adolescent (A): 94 % P: 98 %--------------Y: 55 % C: Child 44 %A: Adolescent 63 % 1---------0.003
Benefits of procedure P: 100 %--------------Y: 76 % C: 53 %A, 100 % P: 98 %--------------Y: 83 % C: Child 69 %A: Adolescent 92 % 1----------0.58
Risks of procedures (Subscore = 3) P: 92 %--------------Y: 84 % C: 68 %A, 100 % P: 48 %--------------Y: 15 % C: Child 0 %A: Adolescent 25 %  < 0.0001----------- < 0.0001
Alternatives to procedure P: 72 %--------------Y: 24 % C: 5 %A, 44 % P: 43 %--------------Y: 15 % C: 6 %A: 21 % 0.01---------0.39
Complete informed consent comprehension1 (%) P: 69 %--------------Y: 22 % C: 0 %A: 44 % P: 25 %--------------Y: 8 % C: 0 %A: 13 % 0.0002---------0.11

Percentages presented reflect the % of the study group that completely understood the informed consent element. Youth = Child (7 – 12 years) and Adolescent (13 – 17 years).

1

Complete informed consent comprehension meant that the participant understood all key IC elements (nature of the procedure, benefits of the procedure, risks of the procedure, AND alternatives to the procedure).