Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Feb 6.
Published in final edited form as: J Exerc Physiol Online. 2016 Dec;19(6):156–169.

Table 2.

Bland-Altman Limit Analysis Between the HG_MC and the EX_WRIC for Validations and Subject Cycling Exercise.

Comparison Parameter Bias 95% CI Limits of Agreement Proportional Bias (P<0.05)
Ethanol vs. HG_MC EE (kcal·30-min) 6.01±3.61 3.77-8.25 -1.22-13.24 0.01
RQ (VO2/VCO2) 0.01±0.01 0.00-0.01 0.00-0.02 NA
VO25 (L·30-min) 0.83±0.68 0.41-1.26 -0.53-2.20 0.02
VCO26 (L·30-min) 0.59±0.46 0.31-0.88 -0.33-1.52 0.03
Propane vs. EX_WRIC EE (kcal·30-min) 0.12±1.86 -1.03-1.27 -3.60-3.84 0.73
RQ (VO2/VCO2) 0.00±0.03 -0.02-0.02 -0.06-0.06 NA
VO2 (L·30-min) -0.18±0.48 -0.48-0.11 -1.13-0.77 0.88
VCO2 (L·30-min) -0.15±0.20 -0.28- -0.03 -0.55-0.24 0.15
HG_MC vs. EX_WRIC EXEE (kcal·30-min) 49.95±46.05 26.65-73.26 -42.15-142.05 0.20
RQ (VO2/VCO2) -0.07±0.07 -0.11- -0.04 -0.21-0.06 0.80
VO2 (L·30-min) 6.95±12.77 0.48-13.41 -18.60-32.49 0.07
VCO2 (L·30-min) 3.22±12.27 -2.98-9.43 -21.32-27.76 0.70