Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 6;12(2):e0171521. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171521

Table 2. Comparisons of fecal bacterial counts between stroke patients and control subjects.

Bacterial counts (log10 cells/g) Detection rate (%)a
Stroke patientsb Controlsb p-valuec qd Stroke patients Controls p-valuee
Obligate anaerobes
C. coccoides group 9.7 ± 0.6 10.0 ± 0.6 0.03 0.13 100 100 1.00
C. leptum subgroup 9.6 ± 0.6 9.6 ± 0.8 0.81 0.89 100 100 1.00
B. fragilis group 8.8 ± 0.8 9.2 ± 0.8 0.05 0.13 100 100 1.00
Bifidobacterium 9.1 ± 1.3 9.3 ± 0.9 0.93 0.84 100 100 1.00
Atopobium cluster 9.5 ± 0.6 9.2 ± 0.5 0.01 0.13 100 95 0.24
Prevotella 7.3 ± 1.6 7.1 ± 1.6 0.63 0.84 71 68 0.81
C. difficile 4.8 ± 0.4 5.3 ± 1.2 1.00 0.84 5 5 1.00
C. perfringens 9.7 ± 0.6 9.7 ± 0.6 0.97 0.89 56 53 0.82
Facultative anaerobes
Lactobacillus 7.4 ± 1.6 7.0 ± 1.4 0.18 0.36 1.00
Enterobacteriaceae 7.1 ± 1.0 7.2 ± 1.2 0.71 0.84 100 90 0.05
Enterococcus 6.8 ± 1.3 6.1 ± 1.4 0.03 0.13 90 93 1.00
Streptococcus 9.3 ± 0.8 9.0 ± 1.0 0.23 0.36 100 98 0.49
Staphylococcus 4.7 ± 1.0 4.3 ± 0.7 0.08 0.13 93 90 0.71
Aerobes
Pseudomonas 4.6 ± 1.4 4.7 ± 0.7 0.91 0.89 27 33 0.63

aDetection rate represents the percentage of fecal samples that contained specific bacterial groups/genera/species above the detection threshold.

bMeans and standard deviations are indicated.

cStatistical differences were examined using the Mann-Whitney U test.

dq values were calculated using the Benjamini and Hochberg method.

eStatistical differences were analyzed using Fisher’s exact test.