Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 1;12(2):287–297. doi: 10.2215/CJN.07940716

Table 6.

Patient-reported measures for HCV+ versus HCV− patients (DOPPS phases 1–5, 1996–2015): Logistic regression models

Outcome Measure (Lower=Better) Outcome Prevalence, % Unadjusted Odds Ratio (95% CI)a Adjusted Odds Ratio (95% CI)b
Depressionc 44.1 1.28 (1.17 to 1.40)d 1.27 (1.16 to 1.40)d
Prurituse 40.6 1.24 (1.16 to 1.33)d 1.27 (1.18 to 1.36)d
Lack of appetitef 23.2 1.25 (1.16 to 1.35)d 1.22 (1.12 to 1.32)d

HCV+, hepatitis C virus-positive; HCV−, hepatitis C virus-negative; DOPPS, Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval.

a

Adjusted for DOPPS country (United States black and nonblack patients considered separately)and phase and accounting for facility clustering.

b

Additionally adjusted for age, sex, time on dialysis, 13 summary comorbidities and hepatitis B infection, and albumin, phosphorus, and creatinine levels.

c

Odds ratio from a logistic model for a Center for Epidemiologic Studies Short Depression Scale (CES-D-10) score ≥10 (versus <10) for HCV+ versus HCV− patients (n=34,035 patients); not collected in DOPPS phase 1 (1996–2001).

d

P<0.05.

e

Odds ratio for moderately to extremely bothered by itchiness for HCV+ versus HCV− patients (n=52,469 patients).

f

Odds ratio for moderately to extremely bothered by lack of appetite for HCV+ versus HCV− patients (n=52,185 patients).