Table 3. Meta-analysis data for patient satisfaction with nipple sparing mastectomy.
| Variable | SS (%) | SE | Weight (%) | SS, 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Study | ||||
| Didier et al. (1) | 79.0 | 0.0323 | 41.2 | 0.79 (0.727, 0.853) |
| Djohan et al. (2) | 72.0 | 0.0508 | 20.2 | 0.72 (0.620, 0.820) |
| Munhoz et al. (4) | 94.4 | 0.0542 | 4.7 | 0.944 (0.838, 1.050) |
| Nahabedian and Tsangaris (5) | 57.1 | 0.1429 | 3.1 | 0.571 (0.359, 0.975) |
| Sacchini et al. (6) | 90.0 | 0.0286 | 28.5 | 0.90 (0.844, 0.956) |
| Ueda et al. (7) | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Yueh et al. (8) | 66.7 | 0.1571 | 2.3 | 0.667 (0.359, 0.975) |
| Pooled estimate | 80.5 | – | 100.0 | 0.805 (0.765, 0.844) |
SS, satisfaction score; SE, standard error; CI, confidence interval; NA, not applicable.