Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 26;100(2):267–280. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.01.004

Table 1.

Illustration of Automated Interpretation of De Novo Variants from Individuals with Several Different Diseases and Control Subjects

Interpretation DD SCZ ASD EE ID Affected Subjects Control Subjects
Benign 7 3 52 0 0 62 0
Likely benign 288 241 1,085 59 56 1,729 250
Uncertain significance 819 466 2,869 180 125 4,459 493
Likely pathogenic 339 199 967 81 80 1,666 206
Pathogenic 125 26 226 17 36 430 10
Total 1,578 935 5,199 337 297 8,346 959
Benign and likely benign 295 244 1,137 59 56 1,791 250
Pathogenic and likely pathogenic 464 225 1,193 98 116 2,096 216
p value (compared to control subjects)a 4.71E−7 0.65 0.06 0.00061 2.07E−6 0.0022
OR and 95% CI 0.55 (0.44–0.69) 0.94 (0.72–1.21) 0.82 (0.67–1.00) 0.52 (0.35–0.75) 0.42 (0.29–0.60) 0.74 (0.61–0.90)

Abbreviations are as follows: DDD, developmental disorder; SCZ, schizophrenia; ASD, autism spectrum disorder; EE, epileptic encephalopathy; ID, intellectual disability; OR, odds ratio; and CI, confidence interval.

a

p values were calculated with a two-sided Fisher’s exact test.