Skip to main content
. 2016 May 24;26(5):e5080. doi: 10.5812/ijp.5080

Table 2. Comparison of Selected Data Between ELBW Children and the Control Group.

Study Group Control Group P Value
Birth parameters
Female/male 44/23 19/23 0.15
Birth weight ( g) 850 ± 128 3571 ± 538 < 0.001
Gestational age (wk) 27 ± 2.27 39.8 ± 1.42 < 0.001
Neonatal period interventions
Mechanical ventilation (%) 91 0 < 0.001
Surfactant administration (%) 73 0 < 0.001
PDA ligation (%) 27 0 < 0.001
First follow-up
Height (cm) 115.5 ± 6.7 124.9 ± 7.4 < 0.001
Height (z-score) -0,89 0,18 < 0.001
Weight (kg) 19.5 ± 3.9 25.2 ± 5.3 < 0.001
Weight (z-score) -0.9 0.2 < 0.001
Second follow-up
Height (cm) 142 ± 7 145 ± 9 0.09
Height (z-score) - 1.09 0.21 < 0.001
Weight (kg) 34 ± 8 39±8 0.017
Weight (z-score) - 1.32 0.12 < 0.001

Abbreviation: ELBW, extremely low birth weight.