Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 25;9(1):6. doi: 10.3390/nu9010006

Table 3.

Association between urinary iodine concentration and place of residence, socio-demographic factors, anthropometry and salt iodine content.

Unadjusted Adjusted
UIC 1 < 100 µg/L UIC 1 ≥ 300 µg/L UIC 1 < 100 µg/L UIC 1 ≥ 300 µg/L
n % 2 RPR 3 C.I. 5 % 2 RPR 4 C.I. 5 RPR3 C.I. 5 RPR 4 C.I. 5
Gender
p 6 = 0.44 p 7 < 0.001 p 6 = 0.41 p 7 < 0.001
Male 780 9.9% 1 30.1% 1 1 1
Female 780 13.1% 1.2 0.8–1.8 19.6% 0.6 0.4–0.8 1.2 0.8–1.8 0.5 0.3–0.7
Age
p 6 = 0.06 p 7 = 0.54 p 6 = 0.045 p 7 = 0.41
6–7 years 441 13.4% 1 26.9% 1 1 1
8–9 years 537 12.7% 0.9 0.6–1.4 23.9% 0.8 0.6–1.2 0.9 0.6–1.6 0.8 0.6–1.2
9–12 years 582 8.7% 0.6 0.4–0.9 24.8% 0.8 0.6–1.2 0.6 0.4–0.9 0.8 0.6–1.1
Milieu
p 6 = 0.92 p 7 = 0.75 p 6 = 0.89 p 7 = 0.89
Urban 858 11.4% 1.0 0.5–2.0 25.7% 1.1 0.6–2.2 1.0 0.5–1.8 1.0 0.6–1.5
Rural 702 11.4% 1 23.8% 1 1 1
Region
p 6 < 0.001 p 8 < 0.001 p 6 = 0.008 p 7 < 0.001
Greater Tunis 240 11.2% 1 28.1% 1 1 1
North East 180 25.5% 2.3 1.5–3.4 13.1% 0.5 0.2–1.2 2.1 1.4–3.1 0.4 0.2–1.1
North West 360 8.4% 0.7 0.4–1.2 22.1% 0.7 0.2–2.0 0.6 0.3–1.2 0.6 0.2–1.8
Central East 240 8.9% 0.6 0.3–1.4 15.2% 0.4 0.1–1.4 0.6 0.3–1.3 0.4 0.1–1.4
Central West 180 9.7% 0.8 0.3–2.2 22.8% 0.7 0.2–2.4 0.8 0.3–1.9 0.6 0.2–1.9
South East 180 7.5% 1.4 0.3–6.2 62.5% 4.5 1.5–13.9 1.2 0.3–5.2 4.9 1.6–14.7
South West 180 4.3% 0.4 0.2–0.9 34.2% 1.2 0.4–3.4 0.4 0.1–1.0 1.1 0.4–3.0
Education of the father
p 6 = 0.54 p 7 = 0.16 p 6 = 0.26 p 7 = 0.032
No formal schooling 92 9.8% 0.9 0.4–1.7 32.7% 1.5 1–2.3 0.9 0.4–1.9 1.8 1.2–2.7
Primary schooling 648 9.9% 0.8 0.5–1.2 25.8% 1.1 0.8–1.5 0.7 0.4–1.2 1.2 0.9–1.8
Secondary and more 820 12.7% 1 23.8% 1 1 1
Education of the mother
p 6 = 0.17 p 7 = 0.77 p 6 = 0.41 p 8 = 0.52
No formal schooling 236 6.8% 0.6 0.3–1.2 29.1% 1.2 0.7–2.1 0.7 0.3–1.7 1.4 0.8–2.5
Primary schooling 648 12.6% 1.1 0.6–2.0 24.6% 1.0 0.7–1.4 1.2 0.7–2.1 1.1 0.8–1.6
Secondary and more 676 11.7% 1 24.3% 1 1 1
Occupation of the father
p 6 = 0.24 p 7 = 0.79 p 6 = 0.033 p 7 = 0.82
Not working 93 13.3% 1.5 0.8–2.9 22.9% 1.0 0.4–2.3 1.9 1.0–3.5 1.0 0.4–1.8
Worker/employee 1104 12.1% 1.4 0.9–2.2 25.3% 1.1 0.8–1.4 1.7 1.1–2.5 0.8 0.4–1.7
Middle/upper executive 363 9.0% 1 24.8% 1 1 1
Occupation of the mother
p 6 = 0.86 p 7 = 0.88 p 6 = 0.75 p 7 = 0.45
Not working 1234 11.6% 0.9 0.5–1.6 24.8% 0.9 0.5–1.5 0.7 0.3–1.9 0.9 0.4–2.0
Worker/employee 181 9.9% 0.8 0.3–2.1 24.9% 0.9 0.4–1.7 0.9 0.5–1.6 0.7 0.4–1.3
Middle/upper executive 145 12.1% 1 26.9% 1 1 1
Body Mass Index forage (z–scores)
p 6 = 0.66 p 8 = 0.29 p 6 = 0.76 p 8 = 0.15
Thinness(<–2) 138 9.5% 0.8 0.4–1.8 23.7% 0.9 0.5–1.6 1.0 0.4–2.1 1.0 0.6–1.7
Normal weight (–2 to <+1) 1162 11.2% 1 24.7% 1 1 1
Overweight (≥+1) 260 13.7% 1.4 0.6–3.0 27.2% 1.2 0.9–1.7 1.4 0.6–3.3 1.4 0.9–2.1
Iodine content of salt used in the household (mg/kg)
p 6 = 0.24 p 7< 0.001 p 6 = 0.22 p 7 = 0.002
Non iodized (0) 103 7.6% 0.6 0.3–1.5 16.5% 0.5 0.3–0.9 0.7 0.3–2.0 0.5 0.2–1.0
Inadequately iodized (>0 to <15) 207 17.0% 1.5 1.0–2.5 15.6% 0.5 0.4–0.8 1.5 1.0–2.3 0.7 0.4–1.1
Adequately iodized(≥15 to <25) 890 10.4% 1 26.0% 1 1 1
Excessively iodized (≥25) 360 10.8% 1.1 0.7–1.9 29.8% 1.0 0.8–1.4 1.0 0.6–1.7 1.1 0.8–1.5

1 UIC: Urinary iodine concentration; 2 Weighted % (accounting for sampling design, including unequal probabilities of selection); 3 RPR: For category of cofactor vs. reference category (for which RPR = 1), crude or adjusted Relative Prevalence Ratio of having UIC < 100 vs. having UIC in the 100 < UIC < 300 category (base response category); 4 RPR: For category of cofactor vs. reference category (for which RPR = 1), crude or adjusted Relative Prevalence Ratio of having high iodine (IUC ≥ 300) vs. having UIC in the 100 < UIC < 300 category (base response category); 5 C.I.: 0.95 sampling design based confidence interval for crude or adjusted RPR; 6 Crude or adjusted P-value for association of ID (iodine <100) with co-factor; 7 Crude or adjusted p-value for association of excess of iodine (≥300) with a co-factor.