Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 6;9(1):42. doi: 10.3390/nu9010042

Table 2.

Results of meta-regression analyses. Analyzed using a random-effects restricted maximum of likelihood (REML)-based meta-regression model.

Variable Total Trials, k SMD for Pain 95% CI τ2 I2 p-Value for Interaction
All trials 30 −0.24 (−0.42 to −0.07) 0.150 63% n.a.
Diagnoses 0.147 60% 0.024 a
  RA 22 −0.21 (−0.42 to −0.00) a
  OA 5 −0.16 (−0.57 to 0.24)
  Other 3 −0.63 (−1.20 to −0.06) a
Supplementation type 0.137 60% 0.009 a
  Capsule 23 −0.25 (−0.44 to −0.06) a
  Bottle 3 0.19 (−0.37 to 0.75)
  Unclear 4 −0.61 (−1.16 to −0.05) a
Type of control 0.148 60% 0.051
  PUFA w/o EPA and DHA 11 −0.12 (−0.41 to 0.17)
  Non-PUFA oils 10 −0.30 (−0.59 to −0.01) a
  Non-oils 3 −0.63 (−1.13 to −0.12) a
  Unclear 3 −0.01 (−0.59 to 0.56)
  None 3 −0.21 (−0.87 to 0.44)
Duration 0.165 63% 0.074
  <12 weeks 3 −0.30 (−0.89 to 0.30)
  ≥12 weeks and <24 weeks 12 −0.25 (−0.53 to 0.03)
  ≥24 weeks 15 −0.23 (−0.48 to 0.03)
  Unspecified 0
Ratio of EPA/DHA 0.153 61% 0.031 a
  Ratio of EPA/DHA ≤1.5 12 −0.12 (−0.40 to 0.15)
  Ratio of EPA/DHA of >1.5 11 −0.38 (−0.67 to −0.10) a
  Unspecified 7 −0.23 (−0.62 to 0.17)
Dosage of EPA plus DHA 0.138 58% 0.016 a
  <2.6 g/day 8 −0.45 (−0.75 to −0.15) a
  ≥2.6 g/day and <3.6 g/day 11 −0.21 (−0.51 to 0.09)
  ≥3.6 g/day 4 0.13 (−0.32 to 0.57)
  Unspecified 7 −0.22 (−0.60 to 0.16)
Source of marine oil 0.130 57% 0.011 a
  Whole fish 19 −0.17 (−0.38 to 0.05)
  Mussel 2 −0.95 (−1.60 to −0.31) a
  Other 6 −0.19 (−1.53 to 0.16)
  Unspecified 3 −0.35 (−0.97 to 0.26)
Bias domains
Random sequence generation (selection bias) 0.160 61% 0.043 a
  Adequate 4 −0.33 (−0.78 to 0.13)
  Unclear 22 −0.19 (−0.40 to 0.02)
  Inadequate 4 −0.48 (−1.00 to 0.05)
Allocation concealment (selection bias) 0.155 61% 0.039 a
  Adequate 3 −0.52 (−1.09 to 0.05)
  Unclear 25 −0.22 (−0.42 to −0.03) a
  Inadequate 2 −0.03 (−0.76 to 0.70)
Blinding of participants (performance bias) 0.149 61% 0.026 a
  Adequate 9 −0.10 (−0.42 to 0.22)
  Unclear 10 −0.41 (−0.70 to −0.11) a
  Inadequate 11 −0.20 (−0.49 to 0.10)
Blinding of personnel (performance bias) 0.163 63% 0.060
  Adequate 5 −0.25 (−0.70 to 0.20)
  Unclear 17 −0.29 (−0.52 to −0.05) a
  Inadequate 8 −0.13 (−0.50 to 0.24)
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 0.152 60% 0.020 a
  Adequate 2 0.06 (−0.61 to 0.73)
  Unclear 10 −0.44 (−0.77 to −0.12) a
  Inadequate 18 −0.18 (−0.40 to 0.04)
Outcome reporting (outcome reporting bias for pain) 0.145 61% 0.016 a
  Adequate 27 −0.20 (−0.38 to −0.02) a
  Unclear 1 −0.94 (−2.10 to 0.21)
  Inadequate 2 −0.72 (−1.52 to 0.08)
Funding source 0.149 61% 0.031 a
  Industry only 8 −0.10 (−0.41 to 0.21)
  Mixed 8 −0.10 (−0.44 to 0.25)
  Nonprofit only 4 −0.41 (−0.87 to 0.05)
  Not reported 7 −0.31 (−0.70 to 0.08)
  Unclear 3 −0.80 (−1.42 to −0.16) a

95% CI: 95% confidence interval, I2: heterogeneity, SMD: standardized mean difference, k: number of trials, τ2: estimated between-study variance; a p < 0.05.