Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 7;8:131. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00131

Table 1.

Analysis of variance and mean comparisons for mycorrhizal root colonization and Trichoderma spp. population in roots of lettuce plants grown with different nutrient solutions and biostimulants.

Source of variance Mycorrhiza root colonization (%) Trichoderma spp. (CFU/g)
Nutrient solution (N) ∗∗∗ ns
Biostimulant (B) ∗∗∗ ∗∗
N × B ∗∗∗ ns
Nutrient solution
Standard 21.3 6.3 × 104
Alkaline 16.8 1.6 × 104
Saline 11.8 4.0 × 104
Biostimulant
No application 0.0 3.9 × 102b
Tablet 24.9 6.3 × 104a
Tablet + PH 25.0 5.5 × 104a
N × B
Standard solution without biostimulant 0.0c 8.7 × 102
Standard solution + Tablet 31.8a 1.0 × 105
Standard solution + Tablet + PH 32.1a 8.8 × 104
Alkaline solution without biostimulant 0.0c 1.1 × 102
Alkaline solution + Tablet 25.6ab 2.7 × 104
Alkaline solution + Tablet + PH 24.9ab 2.1 × 104
Saline solution without biostimulant 0.0c 1.8 × 102
Saline solution + Tablet 17.3b 6.2 × 104
Saline solution + Tablet + PH 18.0b 5.7 × 104

ns, ∗∗,∗∗∗ Non-significant or significant at P ≤ 0.01, and 0.001, respectively. Different letters within each column indicate significant differences according to Duncan’s multiple-range test (P = 0.05). Tablet = microbial-based biostimulant ‘Click Horto’ containing 200 spores/tablet of Rhizophagus irregularis BEG72 plus 4.5 × 107 CFU/tablet of Trichoderma atroviride MUCL45632; PH = plant derived-protein hydrolysate ‘Trainer.’