Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 7;8:131. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00131

Table 2.

Analysis of variance and mean comparisons for shoot fresh weight, dry weight of shoots and roots, total root length, average root diameter, and total root surface of lettuce plants grown with different nutrient solutions and biostimulants.

Source of variance Shoot fresh weight (g/plant) Shoot dry weight (g plant-1) Root dry weight (g plant-1) Total root length (m plant-1) Root diameter (mm) Total root surface (cm2 plant-1)
Nutrient solution (N) ∗∗∗ ∗∗ ∗∗∗ ns ∗∗
Biostimulant (B) ∗∗∗ ∗∗∗ ∗∗ ∗∗ ns
N × B ns ns ns ns ns
Nutrient solution
Standard 175.4ˆa 7.81ˆa 1.86 531.4ˆa 0.29 48.4ˆa
Alkaline 161.6ˆa 7.87ˆa 1.79 484.1ˆb 0.30 44.5ˆab
Saline 119.4ˆb 7.02ˆb 1.55 405.1ˆc 0.28 37.0ˆb
Biostimulant
No application 122.2ˆc 6.03ˆb 1.47 436.8ˆc 0.28 40.5ˆc
Tablet 155.2ˆb 8.06ˆa 1.75 470.4ˆb 0.29 42.7ˆb
Tablet + PH 179.2ˆa 8.62ˆa 1.98 510.1ˆa 0.29 46.5ˆa
N × B
Standard solution without biostimulant 145.8 5.93 1.63ˆbc 494.1 0.29 45.8
Standard solution + Tablet 171.5 8.45 1.84ˆab 538.5 0.29 48.7
Standard solution + Tablet + PH 209.1 9.05 2.12ˆa 561.6 0.30 50.6
Alkaline solution without biostimulant 132.7 6.53 1.48ˆcd 460.4 0.29 43.2
Alkaline solution + Tablet 166.0 8.37 1.81ˆab 472.0 0.30 43.3
Alkaline solution + Tablet + PH 186.3 8.72 2.08ˆa 519.8 0.30 47.1
Saline solution without biostimulant 88.0 5.62 1.31ˆd 355.9 0.27 32.6
Saline solution + Tablet 128.0 7.36 1.61ˆbc 400.8 0.29 36.1
Saline solution + Tablet + PH 142.3 8.09 1.74ˆbc 458.6 0.28 42.4

ns, , ∗∗, ∗∗∗ Non-significant or significant at P ≤ 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001, respectively. Different letters within each column indicate significant differences according to Duncan’s multiple-range test (P = 0.05). Tablet = microbial-based biostimulant ‘Click Horto’ containing 200 spores/tablet of R. irregularis BEG72 plus 4.5 × 107 CFU/tablet of T. atroviride MUCL45632; PH = plant derived-protein hydrolysate ‘Trainer.’