Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 21;14(1):98. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14010098

Table A1.

Warning Label Requirements in the GATS survey years and in 2014.

Country Pictorial a % Front % Back % Average Misleading Terms Ban
GATS Year 2014 GATS Year 2014 GATS Year 2014 GATS Year 2014 GATS Year 2014
Argentina Yes Yes 50 50 50 50 50 50 Yes Yes
Brazil Yes Yes 0 30 100 100 50 65 Yes Yes
China No No 30 35 30 35 30 35 Yes Yes
Egypt Yes Yes 50 50 50 50 50 50 Yes Yes
Greece * No No 30 30 40 40 35 35 Yes Yes
Malaysia Yes Yes 40 50 60 60 50 55 Yes Yes
Mexico No Yes 0 30 50 100 25 65 Yes Yes
Nigeria No No Not specified Not specified Not specified Not specified Not specified Not specified No Yes
Panama Yes Yes 50 50 50 50 50 50 Yes Yes
The Philippines * No No 30 30 0 0 15 15 No Yes
Poland * No No 30 30 40 40 35 35 Yes Yes
Romania Yes Yes 30 43 40 53 35 48 Yes Yes
Russia Federation No Yes 30 30 50 50 40 40 No No
Thailand Yes Yes 50 85 50 85 50 85 Yes Yes
Turkey No Yes 30 65 40 65 35 65 Yes Yes
Ukraine Yes Yes 50 50 50 50 50 50 Yes Yes
Uruguay Yes Yes 50 80 50 80 50 80 Yes Yes
Vietnam No Yes 30 50 30 50 30 50 No No

Note: a Countries with large pictorial warnings also met the 7 characteristics in W score. * In 2016, the Philippines, Greece, and Poland implemented pictorial warnings that are 50%, 65%, and 65% of the front and back of the package, respectively.