Table 5. Cox proportional hazard analysis of EFS in NB patients.
Variable | rho | chisq | P |
---|---|---|---|
MYCN (amp vs non-amp) | 0.12 | 2.64 | 1.04E-01 |
SNHG1 (≥ 5.65 vs < 5.65) | 0.07 | 0.82 | 3.66E-01 |
TAF1D (≥ 4.11 vs < 4.11) | −0.12 | 2.60 | 1.07E-01 |
GLOBAL | NA | 5.46 | 1.41E-01 |
The non-significant P-value for each variable and the global test as a whole indicates that the hazard ratio obtained is constant over time.