Table 4.
Functional amino acid contents of soybean in response to the presence and absence of biochar and G. geotrichum when applied individually and in combination
Treatment | Asp (µg/g) | Thr (µg/g) | Met (µg/g) | ILE (µg/g) | Ser (µg/g) | Glu (µg/g) | Leu (µg/g) | Tyr (µg/g) | Gly (µg/g) | Phe (µg/g) | Lys (µg/g) | Cys (µg/g) | Val (µg/g) | His (µg/g) | Arg (µg/g) | Pro (µg/g) | Total amino acids (µg/g) | |
Control | 20.73±2.13d | 7.09±0.37c | 1.52±0.56c | 11.42±0.71b | 4.64±0.84d | 13.96±1.96d | 24.16±2.10b | 5.37±0.22a | 5.70±0.38d | 11.39±1.94ab | 8.62±0.62ab | 2.78±0.63d | 10.34±1.51b | 3.88±0.41b | 10.59±0.92c | 7.86±2.81b | 150.05c | |
GG | 45.70±5.95a | 11.51±1.15a | 1.79±0.49b | 11.79±1.32ab | 9.03±0.75a | 20.55±1.45b | 26.42±2.64b | 5.79±0.14a | 8.28±0.15b | 8.36±1.64b | 13.00±1.02a | 2.86±0.73c | 14.02±3.85a | 5.30±0.24a | 15.14±1.94b | 10.66±2.26a | 210.05a | |
BC | 31.99±3.78c | 9.51±0.76b | 1.41±0.07d | 8.28±0.96c | 5.99±0.25c | 18.04±1.15c | 30.49±2.90a | 0.00±0.00b | 6.39±0.95c | 11.03±1.30ab | 7.08±0.29b | 3.57±0.55a | 14.51±2.75a | 5.23±0.34a | 15.42±2.26b | 10.42±1.05a | 179.36b | |
BC+GG | 36.12±4.71b | 9.62±1.45b | 2.12±0.86a | 12.45±1.24a | 6.26±0.31b | 30.66±1.76a | 22.95±0.00c | 0.00±0.00b | 11.52±1.08a | 12.22±1.17a | 9.80±0.68ab | 3.66±0.35a | 14.98±2.94a | 6.18±0.47a | 17.07±1.16a | 11.32±2.65a | 206.57a |
BC: biochar; GG: G. geotrichum; Asp: aspartic acid; Thr: threonine; Met: methionine; ILE: isoleucine; Ser: serine; Glu: glutamic acid; Leu: leucine; Tyr: tyrosine; Gly: glycine; Phe: phenylalanine; Lys: lysine; Cys: cysteine; Val: valine; His: histidine; Arg: arginine; Pro: proline. The amino acids were analyzed from freeze-dried soybean plants in the presence and absence of biochar and G. geotrichum applied individually and in combination, to identify the beneficial effects of their interactions. Each value is expressed as mean±SD of six replicates from three independent experiments. The data were analyzed by ANOVA using SAS. Values in a column followed by different letters show the significant differences (P<0.05) among treatments based on DMRT