Table 4.
Treatment | Asp (µg/g) | Thr (µg/g) | Met (µg/g) | ILE (µg/g) | Ser (µg/g) | Glu (µg/g) | Leu (µg/g) | Tyr (µg/g) | Gly (µg/g) | Phe (µg/g) | Lys (µg/g) | Cys (µg/g) | Val (µg/g) | His (µg/g) | Arg (µg/g) | Pro (µg/g) | Total amino acids (µg/g) | |
Control | 20.73±2.13d | 7.09±0.37c | 1.52±0.56c | 11.42±0.71b | 4.64±0.84d | 13.96±1.96d | 24.16±2.10b | 5.37±0.22a | 5.70±0.38d | 11.39±1.94ab | 8.62±0.62ab | 2.78±0.63d | 10.34±1.51b | 3.88±0.41b | 10.59±0.92c | 7.86±2.81b | 150.05c | |
GG | 45.70±5.95a | 11.51±1.15a | 1.79±0.49b | 11.79±1.32ab | 9.03±0.75a | 20.55±1.45b | 26.42±2.64b | 5.79±0.14a | 8.28±0.15b | 8.36±1.64b | 13.00±1.02a | 2.86±0.73c | 14.02±3.85a | 5.30±0.24a | 15.14±1.94b | 10.66±2.26a | 210.05a | |
BC | 31.99±3.78c | 9.51±0.76b | 1.41±0.07d | 8.28±0.96c | 5.99±0.25c | 18.04±1.15c | 30.49±2.90a | 0.00±0.00b | 6.39±0.95c | 11.03±1.30ab | 7.08±0.29b | 3.57±0.55a | 14.51±2.75a | 5.23±0.34a | 15.42±2.26b | 10.42±1.05a | 179.36b | |
BC+GG | 36.12±4.71b | 9.62±1.45b | 2.12±0.86a | 12.45±1.24a | 6.26±0.31b | 30.66±1.76a | 22.95±0.00c | 0.00±0.00b | 11.52±1.08a | 12.22±1.17a | 9.80±0.68ab | 3.66±0.35a | 14.98±2.94a | 6.18±0.47a | 17.07±1.16a | 11.32±2.65a | 206.57a |
BC: biochar; GG: G. geotrichum; Asp: aspartic acid; Thr: threonine; Met: methionine; ILE: isoleucine; Ser: serine; Glu: glutamic acid; Leu: leucine; Tyr: tyrosine; Gly: glycine; Phe: phenylalanine; Lys: lysine; Cys: cysteine; Val: valine; His: histidine; Arg: arginine; Pro: proline. The amino acids were analyzed from freeze-dried soybean plants in the presence and absence of biochar and G. geotrichum applied individually and in combination, to identify the beneficial effects of their interactions. Each value is expressed as mean±SD of six replicates from three independent experiments. The data were analyzed by ANOVA using SAS. Values in a column followed by different letters show the significant differences (P<0.05) among treatments based on DMRT