Table 2.
Fit of alternative diversity models to LTT plots derived from the consensus and species tree Bayesian chronograms.
| AICa | ΔAICRC testb | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chronogram | Yule | Birth–death | Best constant model | DDL | DDX | Yule 2-rates | Best variable model | ΔAICRC | P-valuec | Best model |
| Consensus tree | 157.87 | 159.87 | Yule | 153.71 | 158.14 | 152.51 | Yule 2-rates | 5.3583 | 0.0311 | Yule 2-rates |
| Species tree | 147.60 | 149.60 | Yule | 144.70 | 149.10 | 140.99 | Yule 2-rates | 6.5999 | 0.0149 | Yule 2-rates |
aAkaike Information Criterium.
bΔAICRC test (Rabosky, 2006).
cP-value obtained by simulation (5,000 iterations). The null hypothesis of constant rate diversification (Yule) can be rejected at the P-value < 0.05.