Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 8;5:2. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00002

Table 2.

Piecewise exponential survival models for the association of WTC exposure, and OAD diagnosis, with CRS and GERD, separately.

Estimate Model 1—total effect of WTC exposure OAD ignored
Model 2—effect of OAD diagnosis, WTC exposure ignored
Model 3—regression direct effect of WTC exposure
Relative rate 95% CI Relative rate 95% CI Relative rate 95% CI
Models for incidence of chronic rhinosinusitis
WTC exposure: high vs. low 1.90 1.56–2.31 N/A 1.70 1.40–2.06
WTC exposure: high vs. moderate 1.28 1.14–1.44 N/A 1.21 1.08–1.36
WTC exposure: moderate vs. low 1.48 1.25–1.76 N/A 1.40 1.18–1.66
Effect of OAD diagnosis N/A 4.24 3.78–4.76 4.14 3.69–4.65
Models for incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease
WTC exposure: high vs. low 1.48 1.27–1.73 N/A 1.30 1.11–1.51
WTC exposure: high vs. moderate 1.19 1.07–1.32 N/A 1.12 1.01–1.24
WTC exposure: moderate vs. low 1.25 1.09–1.42 N/A 1.16 1.01–1.32
Effect of OAD diagnosis N/A 3.21 2.93–3.52 3.16 2.89–3.47

All models were fit using piecewise exponential survival models and included age, retirement status, smoking status, and season as covariates. Models are defined in the text in Eqs 13.