Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 1;10(12):FC31–FC35. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/21034.9034

[Table/Fig-7]:

Comparison of the results of our study with those of other studies in Iran [16-21].

Researcher Reference number Year Sample type Test Milk contamination (%) Compared with our study
Present - 2009-2013 251 Samples of raw and pasteurized milk in Gonabad city Copan 28.7% of schools, 21.4% of collection centers, 12.5% of factories -
Mahmoudi [16] 2012 200 samples of raw milk dairies in the outskirts of the Tabriz city Delvo test 57.5% Different method and results
Mahmoudi [17] 2011 Samples of raw and pasteurized milk in Ilam Province Copan 29.1% of milk in collection centers and 22.2% of pasteurized milk Antibiotic residues of milk was higher in summer than that of the spring (similar to our study)
Manafi [18] 2008 Raw and pasteurized milk East Azerbaijan Province Delvo test 26% of industrial dairies, 16% of collection centers, and 30% of pasteurized milk In our study, the percentage of contaminated milk samples was more than that of this study
Bahreinipur [19] 2008 200 samples of raw and pasteurized milk collected in Mashhad city Microbial inhibition test 30% Different method and results
Ghanavi [20] 2003 Milk samples collected in Iran Different methods 27% of raw and 5% of pasteurized milk Different method and results
Abedini [21] 1973 800 samples of raw and pasteurized milk in Shiraz city Disc method 2.7% The samples were collected in 8 months (in our study during 12 months)