Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 28;18(1):52. doi: 10.3390/ijms18010052

Table 4.

Mean ± standard deviation (mg/kg) of some of the phenolic compounds determined in the studied monovarietal olive oils.

Compound Picholine Marocaine Dahbia Haouzia Menara
D-Ald-D EA 2012/2013 1.65 aA ± 3.14 0.26 aA ± 0.12 0.83 aA ± 0.87 1.69 aA ± 2.60
Desoxy-EA 9.60 ac ± 4.50 0.40 a ± 0.13 12.40 acd ± 13.39 11.15 acd ± 18.56
Hy-EA 0.19 a ± 0.13 0.23 a ± 0.05 0.15 a ± 0.06 0.12 a ± 0.05
EA 20.69 aA ± 5.49 5.73 dA ± 1.44 17.35 adA ± 5.04 33.68 acA ± 12.23
Hy D-Ol Agl 0.31 bA ± 0.22 0.78 abA ± 0.42 0.20 bA ± 0.15 0.35 abA ± 0.40
DOA 133.66 bA ± 114.84 3.15 dA ± 1.19 18.94 bA ± 14.31 17.00 bA ± 8.64
10 Hy-Ol Agl 0.36 aA ± 0.07 0.37 aA ± 0.08 0.17 aA ± 0.09 0.17 aA ± 0.05
Methyl D-Ol Agl 10.96 cdgA ± 2.34 10.25 abcgA ± 1.63 20.46 eA ± 4.83 28.81 fA ± 8.50
D-Lig Agl 84.50 fA ± 47.17 0.46 deA ± 0.04 2.78 deA ± 1.45 2.41 eA ± 1.07
Dehydro Ol Agl 2.30 aA ± 1.29 15.75 dA ± 2.32 3.59 bceA ± 2.55 5.45 eA ± 1.82
Methyl Ol Agl 1.61 aA ± 1.00 2.05 abcdA ± 0.23 3.02 dA ± 1.80 1.93 abdA ± 0.55
Ol Agl 45.79 abcA ± 17.62 8.73 dA ± 1.52 92.35 efA ± 36.41 98.33 fA ± 34.50
Ol Agl IS1 15.42 abdA ± 6.11 4.59 bA ± 3.28 26.59 acdA ± 19.53 25.80 acdA ± 11.15
Ol Agl IS2 23.34 acdeA ± 7.86 8.95 cA ± 5.45 36.03 bdeA ± 19.49 40.59 beA ± 15.59
Ol Agl IS3 10.65 ceA ± 4.46 5.19 cfA ± 2.05 20.60 dgA ± 10.61 20.32 dgA ± 9.00
Ol Agl IS4 14.04 adeA ± 5.87 1.05 cA ± 0.60 21.89 deA ± 12.89 21.99 eA ± 9.68
Ol Agl IS5 18.07 abA ± 6.83 1.75 dA ± 0.45 32.13 eA ± 14.04 33.92 eA ± 15.93
Ol Agl IS6 18.22 abceA ± 4.57 2.78 dA ± 0.81 27.69 efA ± 9.88 31.83 fA ± 7.31
Lig Agl 42.62 abcegA ± 15.20 15.08 eA ± 2.70 95.84 fgA ± 26.78 113.01 gA ± 48.67
Lig Agl IS1 18.55 abA ± 5.79 9.74 bA ± 2.04 33.34 acdeA ± 12.23 53.91 eA ± 29.04
Lig Agl IS2 16.10 abdA ± 4.76 7.08 dA ± 2.85 26.68 aceA ± 13.61 42.72 eA ± 13.16
Lig Agl IS3 9.38 abceA ± 3.75 4.25 eA ± 5.96 21.41 fgA ± 7.65 22.54 gA ± 7.56
D-Ald-D EA 2013/2014 1.72 aA ± 2.07 0.33 aA ± 0.05 7.50 aA ± 9.24 15.58 aA ± 17.95
Desoxy-EA 18.11 abB ± 2.88 0.53 dA ± 0.14 7.80 abA ± 2.50 10.70 abA ± 6.33
Hy-EA 0.20 aA ± 0.12 0.10 aB ± 0.03 0.47 aceA ± 0.46 0.41 aceB ± 0.08
EA 14.35 dB ± 3.35 22.26 abdB ± 1.63 55.48 abcB ± 10.45 51.04 abA ± 23.13
Hy D-Ol Agl 0.18 bA ± 0.09 0.10 bB ± 0.02 1.04 bA ± 1.46 0.76 bA ± 0.27
DOA 39.58 cB ± 9.24 58.06 cB ± 8.98 87.24 cB ± 54.4 70.68 cB ± 21.18
10 Hy-Ol Agl 0.60 aB ± 0.08 0.14 aB ± 0.06 1.27 abA ± 1.12 0.87 aB ± 0.26
Methyl D-Ol Agl 12.92 aB ± 1.46 7.45 deB ± 0.44 12.84 abdeB ± 0.74 10.91 abdeB ± 2.28
D-Lig Agl 30.68 dB ± 9.99 93.73 aB ± 10.60 57.94 adA ± 55.28 61.62 adB ± 21.87
Dehydro Ol Agl 2.87 acA ± 0.60 6.29 dB ± 0.63 3.46 aA ± 1.09 3.54 aB ± 0.67
Methyl Ol Agl 0.88 aceB ± 0.47 2.65 fB ± 0.35 2.23 fgA ± 0.58 2.75 fB ± 0.38
Ol Agl 35.20 abdA ± 7.56 26.12 abdB ± 0.42 63.47 eA ± 12.68 41.56 abdeB ± 10.47
Ol Agl IS1 19.16 acdA ± 6.21 4.28 dA ± 0.43 23.29 acA ± 3.67 16.22 acdA ± 8.80
Ol Agl IS2 28.84 aA ± 6.80 7.31 eA ± 1.05 31.20 aA ± 3.31 23.85 abdeB ± 10.83
Ol Agl IS3 11.02 acdeA ± 2.52 5.17 eA ± 0.52 16.97 adA ± 3.22 12.51 acdeA ± 4.85
Ol Agl IS4 16.02 aceA ± 3.69 3.73 dB ± 0.38 16.80 aceA ± 2.93 13.36 acdeA ± 5.23
Ol Agl IS5 15.80 aeA ± 3.35 8.32 abB ± 0.71 23.45 eA ± 3.38 18.12 aeB ± 5.06
Ol Agl IS6 20.27 adA ± 2.82 14.75 abcB ± 0.45 21.90 abdA ± 1.58 16.89 abcB ± 3.77
Lig Agl 35.94 beA ± 3.67 33.13 beB ± 0.96 51.14 adeB ± 22.8 43.75 abdeB ± 5.34
Lig Agl IS1 20.23 adA ± 2.94 10.95 abdA ± 1.01 26.80 acdA ± 7.07 21.27 adB ± 6.22
Lig Agl IS2 19.16 acdA ± 4.03 9.28 dA ± 1.11 20.06 acA ± 2.04 17.53 adB ± 4.93
Lig Agl IS3 7.93 aA ± 2.07 6.36 aA ± 1.08 10.39 abcB ± 3.99 9.09 abB ± 1.08

Significant differences in the same row are indicated with different lowercase letters (comparison among the 13 cultivars at the same crop season, p < 0.05) and with different capital letters (comparison between crop seasons for the same cultivar, p < 0.05). Quantitative results for some compounds determined in 4 varieties from those 13 selected for this study are included in this table (to contain its size); therefore, the results shown herewith were treated together with those from Table 2 and Table 3 to carry out ANOVA analysis. Secoiridoids were quantified in terms of Oleuropein.