Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 28;77(2):794–805. doi: 10.1002/mrm.26129

Table 5.

Viscous Energy Loss in Corrected‐AVSD Patients with Normal or Abnormal E‐Peak Vortex Ring Orientation and/or Radial Position

Phase N Vortex Orientation (degrees) EL˙Eavg (W/m3) EL˙Aavg (W/m3) ELdiastole (J/m3)
Patients with Orientation within 95%CI E‐filling 9 71 ± 10a 8.4 ± 1.8a 8.3 ± 3.9b 3.8 [2.6–4.0]c
A‐filling 10 71 ± 7a 9.7 ± 2.6b 6.7 ± 3.9b 3.7 ± 0.8b
Patients with Orientation below 95%CI E‐filling 14 37 ± 11b 10.0 ± 3.2b 8.3 ± 4.2b 4.4 ± 1.30b
A‐filling 9 35 ± 13b 10.0 ± 3.7b 8.3 ± 4.0b 4.8 ± 1.1b
Patients with Orientation above 95%CI E‐filling 3 118 ± 16b 16.1 ± 5.2b 8.1 ± 5.3c 5.8 ± 1.6b
A‐filling 0
N Normalized radial position EL˙Eavg (W/m3) EL˙Aavg (W/m3) ELdiastole(J/m3)
Patients with radial position within 95%CI E‐filling 20 0.29 ± 0.06a 9.5 [7.4–12.5]b 8.1 ± 4.1b 4.1 ± 1.4b
A‐filling 12 0.25 ± 0.07a 10.5 ± 3.4b 6.5 ± 3.3b 4.0(3.4‐5.2)b
Patients radial position below 95%CI E‐filling 0
A‐filling 0
Patients with radial position above 95%CI E‐filling 6 0.43 ± 0.03b 9.0 ± 1.8c 8.8 ± 4.2b 4.6 ± 1.0b
A‐filling 7 0.47 ± 0.04b 8.7 ± 2.0c 9.3 ± 4.5b 4.2 ± 0.7b
Patients with both radial position and orientation within 95%CI E‐filling 8 0.28 ± 0.05a 8.5 ± 1.9a 7.8+‐3.9b 3.7 [2.5–4.0]c
A‐filling 7 0.25 ± 0.08a 9.6 ± 2.9c 4.8 ± 1.7c 3.±1.0c
a

P > 0.05.

b

P ≤ 0.01 when compared with controls.

c

0.01 < P < 0.05 when compared with controls.