Table 3.

Comparison between field-based systems that perform phenotyping of groups of plants.

Platforms	Type	Plants/h	ha/h	Images/h	Bytes/h	Main Capabilities
Vinobot	Semi-automated	35,430	0.41	324,000	380 G	RGB, temperature, humidity, and light intensity
Vinoculer	Fully-automated	12,648	0.09	2592	5.4 G	Mobile, 24/7, Stereo RGB and IR imaging, Air Temperature
“Phenomobile” [14]	Manually-driven	-	0.84	-	2.094 M	IR, multi-spectral imaging, and sonar sensors
${\mathrm{Scanalyzer}}^{Field}$ [9]	Fully-automated	-	0.002	115	6.7 G	Confined, 24/7, RGB, Multispectral, Fluorescence intensity imaging