Table 5.
Regional analysis of the percentage of deceased donor LTs that were ABO nonidentical, the absolute number of ABO-nonidentical LTs, and the percentages of nonidentical LTs that were O→B, A→AB, and B→AB (representing the three most common nonidentical LTs)
UNOS region | Allocation MELD score | ABO-nonidentical LTs among all LTs, % | ABO-nonidentical LTs, n | Among ABO-nonidentical LTs, %
|
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
O→non-O | A→non-A | B→non-B | AB → non-AB | ||||
1 | 31 | 4 | 32 | 69 | 25 | 6 | 0 |
2 | 29 | 13 | 94 | 47 | 32 | 21 | 0 |
3 | 25 | 13 | 95 | 62 | 14 | 24 | 0 |
4 | 31 | 11 | 77 | 68 | 21 | 11 | 0 |
5 | 35 | 19 | 136 | 62 | 30 | 8 | 0 |
6 | 28 | 3 | 23 | 65 | 26 | 9 | 0 |
7 | 30 | 10 | 69 | 72 | 14 | 14 | 0 |
8 | 25 | 7 | 48 | 50 | 25 | 21 | 4 |
9 | 31 | 4 | 29 | 55 | 34 | 11 | 0 |
10 | 24 | 6 | 45 | 44 | 36 | 20 | 0 |
11 | 25 | 9 | 65 | 42 | 32 | 26 | 0 |
LT, liver transplantation.