Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 30;36(1):52–63. doi: 10.1111/dar.12521

Table 1.

Differences in controlling behaviours and technology facilitated abuse by country

Brazil (N = 280) England (N = 223) P OR (95% CI)
Controlling behaviours (7 items)
Try to keep her/him from seeing her/his friends 56 (20.0%) 20 (9.0%) <0.001 0.39 (0.23, 0.68)
Try to restrict contact with her/his family of birth 19 (6.8%) 5 (2.2%) 0.018 0.31 (0.12, 0.86)
Insist on knowing where she/he is at all times 88 (31.5%) 53 (23.8%) 0.054 0.68 (0.45, 1.01)
Ignore her/him and treat her/him indifferently 57 (20.5%) 82 (36.8%) <0.001 2.25 (1.51, 3.36)
Get angry if she/he speaks with another man 103 (36.9%) 53 (23.8%) 0.002 0.53 (0.36, 0.79)
Am often suspicious that she/he is unfaithful 86 (30.8%) 83 (37.2%) 0.132 1.33 (0.92, 1.93)
Expect her/him to ask your permission before seeking health care for herself/himself 23 (8.2%) 2 (0.9%) <0.001 0.10 (0.02, 0.43)
At least one controlling behaviour perpetrated 184 (65.9%) 143 (64.1%) 0.670 0.92 (0.63, 1.33)
Number of controlling behaviour items [mean (SD)] 1.54 (1.57) 1.38 (0.09) 0.122 0.79 (0.65, 0.95)
Technology facilitated abuse (4 items)
Use text messages, phone, etc. to call her/him names, harass her/him or put her/him down 22 (7.9%) 38 (17.1%) 0.001 2.42 (1.39, 4.23)
Use mobile technology to check where she/he is 15 (5.4%) 13 (5.8%) 0.818 1.09 (0.51, 2.35)
Check her/his text messages without her/his permission 42 (15.0%) 46 (20.6%) 0.099 1.47 (0.93, 2.34)
Threaten her/him via text, email or over social media 10 (3.6%) 15 (6.8%) 0.103 1.96 (0.86, 4.44)
Any technology facilitated abuse 57 (20.4%) 73 (32.7%) 0.002 1.90 (1.27, 2.85)
Number of technology facilitated abuse items [mean (SD)] 0.32 (0.75) 0.82 (0.07) 0.014 1.15 (0.73, 1.80)

CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.