Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 22;162(2):318–327. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.23120

Table 2.

Statements and summary of responses from professional anthropologists

Statements about science Common response Correlation
1. The human population may be subdivided into biological races. Strongly disagree or disagree (86%) 0.11
<.00010
1,909
2. Racial categories are determined by biology. Strongly disagree or disagree (88%) 0.11
<.00010
1,903
3. There are discrete biological boundaries among races. Strongly disagree or disagree (93%) 0.14
<.00010
1,868
4. Biological variability exists but this variability does not conform to the discrete packages labeled races. Strongly agree or agree (89%) −0.035
.12
1,894
5. Boundaries between what have been called races are completely arbitrary, depending primarily upon the wishes of the classifier. Strongly agree or agree (69%) 0.0014
.95
1,898
6. Continental population categories—Africans, Asians, Europeans—are the same as standard anthropological racial classifications. Strongly disagree or disagree (73%) 0.070
.0025
1,872
7. Continental population categories—Africans, Asians, Europeans—are useful for examining genetic relationships (i.e., relatedness) among people. Strongly disagree or disagree (38%); Strongly agree or agree (33%) 0.21
<.00010
1,879
8. Race—as defined by the U.S. Office of Management and Budget (i.e., census categories)—is a useful proxy for ancestry. Strongly disagree or disagree (73%) 0.043
.057
1,890
9. Genetic ancestry—inferred from genetic markers—rather than race, is a better proxy for genetic relationships among sub‐Saharan Africans, Asians, Europeans, Pacific Islanders, and Native Americans. Strongly agree or agree (75%) 0.18
<.00010
1,887
10. The distributions of physical traits overlap among races. Strongly agree or agree (89%) 0.016
.48
1,883
11. So‐called racial characteristics are not transmitted as complexes. Strongly agree or agree (67%) −0.082
.00050
1,814
12. Genetic differences between racial groups explain most biological differences between individuals of different races. Strongly disagree or disagree (72%) 0.095
<.00010
1,888
13. Genetic differences between racial groups explain most behavioral differences between individuals of different races. Strongly disagree or disagree (95%) 0.091
<.00010
1,893
14. Most anthropologists believe that humans may be subdivided into biological races. Strongly disagree or disagree (85%) 0.094
<.00010
1,898
15. Most anthropologists believe that categorizing human groups by race has no biological basis. Strongly agree or agree (74%) −0.083
.00030
1,896
16. Most anthropologists believe that categorizing human groups by race has no genetic basis. Strongly agree or agree (61%) −0.12
<.00010
1,877
17. The use of the term ‘race’ to describe human groups should be discontinued. Strongly agree or agree (71%) −0.027
.24
1,888
18. The term “race,” as used to describe human groups, should be replaced by a more appropriate and precise term. Strongly agree or agree (71%) 0.026
.26
1,878
19. Most genetic variants among sub‐Saharan Africans, East Asians, and Western Europeans are shared. Strongly agree or agree (67%) −0.036
.13
1,830
20. Most common genetic variants (i.e., alleles with a frequency of >5%) are shared among sub‐Saharan Africans, East Asians, and Western Europeans. Strongly agree or agree (66%) 0.00086
.97
1,815
21. Genetic variation data may be used to cluster racially ascribed people into groups of continental origin. Strongly disagree or disagree (37%); Strongly agree or agree (29%) 0.18
<.00010
1,843
22. Self‐identified race in the U.S. highly corresponds to genetic inferences of ancestry. Strongly disagree or disagree (67%) 0.084
.00030
1,876
Statements about medicine Common response Correlation
1. Race influences health. Strongly disagree or disagree (42%); Strongly agree or agree (41%) 0.015
.53
1,865
2. Race, in so far as it corresponds with genetic ancestry, influences health. Strongly agree or agree (47%) 0.14
<.00010
1,867
3. Genetic differences between races explain health disparities. Strongly disagree or disagree (71%) 0.19
<.00010
1,847
4. Categorizing individuals by race is important for biomedical research. Strongly disagree or disagree (58%) 0.12
<.00010
1,851
5. Anthropologists should understand key concepts about the relationship among race, genetics and health. Strongly agree or agree (79%) 0.051
.03
1,869
6. Health professionals should understand key concepts about the relationship among race, genetics and health. Strongly agree or agree (80%) 0.067
.0037
1,876
7. The development of medicines for targeted racial groups is a necessary step toward the achievement of personalized medicine. Strongly disagree or disagree (58%) 0.16
<.00010
1,867
8. Race should be considered in diagnosing certain conditions or diseases. Strongly disagree or disagree (51%) 0.086
.00020
1,857
9. Genetic ancestry should be considered in diagnosing certain conditions or diseases. Strongly agree or agree (79%) 0.14
<.00010
1,882
10. Race should be considered in treating certain conditions or diseases. Strongly disagree or disagree (53%) 0.083
.00030
1,850
11. Genetic ancestry should be considered in treating certain conditions or diseases. Strongly agree or agree (77%) 0.14
<.00010
1,885
Statements about social and societal issues Common response Correlation
1. Commercial genetic ancestry testing provides a good assessment of a person's ancestry. Strongly disagree or disagree (39%) 0.28
<.00010
1,804
2. Genetic ancestry testing is purely recreational. Strongly disagree or disagree (33%); Strongly agree or agree (33%) −0.23
<.00010
1,811
3. Genetic ancestry testing does not warrant all the critique it is receiving from the anthropology community. Strongly disagree or disagree (43%) 0.23
<.00010
1,779
4. Genetic ancestry testing is considered by the industry's consumers as purely recreational. Strongly disagree or disagree (48%) 0.052
.030
1,776
5. Consumers value genetic ancestry testing for non‐medical reasons. Strongly agree or agree (73%) 0.078
.0010
1,780
6. Commercial genetic ancestry testing in the U.S. is subject to specific, federal regulation. Strongly disagree or disagree (39%) 0.0073
.76
1,699
7. Commercial genetic ancestry testing in the U.S. should be subject to specific, federal regulation. Strongly agree or agree (53%) −0.054
.024
1,760
8. Criticisms of genetic ancestry testing are overstated compared to the actual risks and limitations of the tests. Strongly disagree or disagree (30%); Strongly agree or agree (16%) 0.20
<.00010
1,747
9. Genetic ancestry testing should not be used in U.S. criminal investigations. Strongly agree or agree (49%) −0.19
<.00010
1,777
10. Genetic ancestry testing should be used by U.S. law enforcement when evaluating conflicting eyewitness descriptions. Strongly disagree or disagree (61%) 0.15
<.00010
1,783
11. Genetic ancestry testing should be considered when agencies place children in foster and adoptive families. Strongly disagree or disagree (82%) 0.061
.0094
1,810
12. Genetic ancestry testing should be used by universities to verify racial or ethnic identity of applicants. Strongly disagree or disagree (90%) 0.070
.0030
1,821
13. Genetic ancestry testing reinforces biological conceptions of race. Strongly agree or agree (50%) −0.25
<.00010
1,785
14. Genetic ancestry testing undermines biological conceptions of race. Strongly disagree or disagree (36%); Strongly agree or agree (28%) 0.18
<.00010
1,785
Common statements Common response Correlation
1. Races don't exist. Strongly agree or agree (59%) −0.059
.011
1,854
2. No races exist now or ever did. Strongly agree or agree (53%) −0.078
.00080
1,840
3. Race has no biological basis. Strongly agree or agree (71%) −0.16
<.00010
1,853
4. Race is biologically meaningless. Strongly agree or agree (73%) −.016
<.00010
1,867
5. Race has no genetic basis. Strongly agree or agree (65%) −0.16
<.00010
1,852
6. Race has no biological influence on health. Strongly agree or agree (49%) −0.15
<.00010
1,832

Note. Left Column: Statements about Race used in Survey. Survey asked respondents to indicate their level of agreement with statements using a five‐point Likert Scale (1 = strongly agree; 5 = strongly disagree). Statements were organized into four themes: science, medicine, society, and common statements. Middle Column: Red shading indicates general disagreement, blue shading indicates general agreement, and green shading indicates respondents are divided. Dark shading indicates the level met or exceeded 75% of responses (super‐majority). Right Column: Spearman Correlation Coefficients between familiarity with genetic ancestry inference and individual responses to statements are shown with p values at 95% confidence interval and number of observations. Bold font denotes statistically significant correlations.