Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 30;73(3):641–650. doi: 10.1002/ps.4480

Table 2.

Number of differentially expressed transcripts between the three discrete emergence time points of first‐generation compared to second‐generation collection time points in the imidacloprid‐resistant field population. Transcripts were considered upregulated if there was a fold change of 2 and FDR value ≤ 0.049

Total upregulated Transcripts in the second‐generation population compared to the first generation Transcripts encoding for cuticular proteins Transcripts encoding for cytochrome P450 Transcripts encoding for glutathione S‐transferase Transcripts encoding for ABC transporters Transcripts encoding for carboxylesterase
Early emergence vs. second generation 469 38 10 2 0 0
Late emergence vs. second generation 624 44 11 2 2 1
Conclusion of first generation vs. second generation 423 40 13 2 2 0
Total unique genes 728