Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb;149(2):277–293. doi: 10.1085/jgp.201611721

Table 1. Peak Na+ current density and persistent Na+ current.

Na+ current tested Con CaM
Peak current density Persistent Na+ current n Peak current density Persistent Na+ current n
pApF % of peak pApF % of peak
NaV1.5TTX-S −210 ± 13       0.63 ± 0.08 35 −211 ± 16        0.54 ± 0.09 25
D1790G −170 ± 22       0.76 ± 0.11 22 −180 ± 22        0.57 ± 0.09 17
Y1795C −205 ± 21       1.74 ± 0.19a 18 −192 ± 12        0.48 ± 0.07 18
E1901Q −175 ± 18       2.47 ± 0.53a 13 −176 ± 24        0.30 ± 0.07 13
Q1909R −188 ± 21       1.40 ± 0.12a 15 −200 ± 28        0.50 ± 0.07 15
R1913H −184 ± 16       1.51 ± 0.21a 15 −188 ± 20        0.50 ± 0.08 15
L1917K −185 ± 21       0.27 ± 0.06 11 −175 ± 25        0.29 ± 0.06 11
ΔKPQ −171 ± 19       1.90 ± 0.19a 14 −170 ± 27        1.95 ± 0.21a 14
NaV1.2 WT −228 ± 37       0.66 ± 0.17 16 −193 ± 16        0.50 ± 0.13 16
H1853R −204 ± 17       1.41 ± 0.20b 15 −181 ± 27        0.61 ± 0.13b 15
R1918H −158 ± 27       3.17 ± 0.53b 20 −162 ± 27        0.80 ± 0.12b 20
NaV1.6 WT −70 ± 4.7       13.20 ± 2.34 24 −79 ± 13        5.01 ± 0.92c 24
NaV1.6TTX-R in Purkinje neurons −119 ± 16       6.96 ± 0.91 12 −130 ± 10        3.36 ± 0.45c 10
Purkinje neurons −137 ± 13       9.03 ± 0.74 22 −132 ± 11        3.75 ± 0.54c 18
a

P < 0.01 compared with NaV1.5TTX-S.

b

P < 0.01 compared with NaV1.2.

c

P < 0.01 compared with Con.