Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 8;5:18. doi: 10.1186/s40168-017-0229-y

Table 3.

Summary of microbial community analysis conducted during phase II

Treatment × species n # readsa MED richnessb MED evenness (J’)c Total community structured Detailed analysis Top 50% MED coverage
PB × P. lobata 2 142,167 (14,141) 129 (35) 0.40 (0.13) VGl, PB: R = 0.75
VGl, VG: R = 1
VG, PB: R = 0.5
p = 0.001 for all
No; low reads
VGl × P. lobata 3 401 (161) 86 (22) 0.70 (0.07)d
PG × P. lobata 1 641 100 0.61
VG × P. lobata 3 2594 (713) 74 (16) 0.29 (0.08) Tested above
PB × P. verrucosa 1 13,153 161 0.53 No; low reads; low biological replication
VGl × P. verrucosa 1 603 117 0.78
PG × P. verrucosa 3 745 (691) 105 (19)d 0.77 (0.16) No differences
VG × P. verrucosa 3 152 (23) 65 (11) 0.85 (0.04)
PB × A. humilis 3 22,105 (20,156) 131 (30) 0.31 (0.21) No differences Yes 0.78
VGl × A. humilis 2 21,133 (27,005) 60 (2)d 0.36 (0.41) 0.67
PG × A. humilis 2 42,241 (53,217) 85 (2) 0.40 (0.45) 0.67
VG × A. humilis 3 15,536 (11,314) 59 (5)d 0.27 (0.21) 0.7
PB × O. faveolata 4 72,587 (25,401) 378 (71) 0.60 (0.16) No differences Yes 0.84
VGl × O. faveolata 4 16,355 (18,421) 237 (90) 0.56 (0.17) 0.71
PG × O. faveolata 4 28,852 (17,895) 392 (87) 0.66 (0.12) 0.77
VG × O. faveolata 4 18,630 (9437) 361 (43) 0.61 (0.10) 0.68
PB × M. cavernosa 0 n/a n/a n/a n/a No; not all treatments represented
VGl × M. cavernosa 2 65,040 (3908) 405 (22) 0.63 (0.12) No differences
PG × M. cavernosa 3 51,741 (26,956) 366 (40) 0.57 (0.04)
VG x M. cavernosa 2 52,055 (7028) 355 (115) 0.67 (0.14)
PB × O. annularis 3 87,777 (11,390) 485 (60) 0.73 (0.09) No differences Yes 0.87
VGl × O. annularis 3 32,681 (4358) 357 (45) 0.74 (0.08) 0.77
PG × O. annularis 3 24,582 (4974) 313 (130) 0.75 (0.15) 0.67
VG × O. annularis 3 34,152 (8088) 382 (123) 0.71 (0.16) 0.77
PB × D. strigosa 1 65,392 268 0.27 n/a No; not all treatments represented; low biological replication
VGl x D. strigosa 0 n/a n/a n/a
PG × D. strigosa 1 60,393 211 0.23
VG × D. strigosa 1 41,726 172 0.18

All values are presented as mean (standard deviation (S. D.)) when appropriate. Single values with no S.D. represent samples from treatments with no replicates, and these values were not included in statistical significance testing

n = number of samples included in microbial community analysis after quality-filtering sequences

aAverage number of reads obtained for that species × treatment grouping out of the total number of analyzed reads

bSpecies superscripts within a column indicate significantly different MED richness between treatments (p < 0.05, one-tailed t test or one-way ANOVA with the Holm-Sidak method post hoc test)

cMED evenness values (J’) for each treatment with different superscripts indicate significant differences in species evenness (p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA with Holm-Sidak method post hoc test)

dDifferences in community structure were first determined using one-way ANOSIM global tests within each coral species (p < 0.05 is significance threshold). If significant differences were found, pairwise tests were conducted between the different treatments. Species × treatment combinations with only one sample were excluded in this analysis