Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Mult Scler. 2015 Sep 11;22(5):641–648. doi: 10.1177/1352458515598020

Table 1.

Visual performance and GCL+IPL, RNFL thickness change over time

Presentation Month 1–2 Month 3 Month 6
(> 5 months)
LogMar visual acuity 0.79 ± 0.93 0.11 ± 0.27 0.06 ± 0.20 0.02 ± 0.10
Visual field MD, dB −17.15 ± 10.80 −3.72 ± 6.50 −1.98 ± 2.43 −1.06 ± 1.67
Days from vision loss 7 ± 3.4 38 ± 13.3 129 ± 35.5 304 ± 128.2
GCL+IPL thickness, μm
  3-D method
82.4 ± 8.8 72.3 ± 9.7 72.5 ± 12.0 69. ± 11.6
GCL+IPL thickness, μm
  2-D method
81.2 ± 14.1 73.6 ± 8.3 72.0 ± 12.0 69.8 ± 10.2
RNFL thickness, μm
  2-D method
114.4 ± 43.4 99.1 ± 18.0 87.0 ± 11.7 84.1 ± 11.2
GCL+IPL thinning from prior visit, μm
  3-D method
9.9 ± 60* 3.0 ± 3.0** 0.2 ± 1.2***

At presentation, unaffected fellow eyes had mean GCL+IPL for 2-D method = 82.1 ± 6.7 μm and for 3-D method = 82.2 ± 7.0 μm, and pRNFL = 91.1 ± 9.8 μm

One subject had the first follow up at six months

*

Range 26.0 μm, Maximum 27.1, Minimum 1.1

**

Range 12.0 μm, Maximum 11.0, Minimum 0

***

Range 6.0 μm, Maximum 2.0, Minimum 0